Plato, Gender, and Eternal Marriage

By January 11, 2016

Jesus said, “For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage” (Matt 22:30), while Plato said in his Symposium that lovers desired Hephestus to “weld” them together so that “when [they] died, [they] would be one and not two in Hades.”[1]

Such was part of Aristophanes’s myth of the androgyn, that humans had once been androgynous pairs that the gods split into male and female, who now longed for their other half. Such lovers, when they found each other, still yearned to become one again, especially in the next life. Aristophanes then adds the following caveat: “Women who are split from a woman, however, pay no attention at all to men; they are oriented more towards women, and lesbians come from this class. People who are split from a male are male-oriented.”[2]

That is, eternal marriage is a Platonic concept, and Plato had allowances for same gender relationships.

Plato didn’t discuss eternal procreation, but in the Republic he did describe a system radically different than monogamy: shared wives and children.[3] In the Republic, the children belong to everyone, or as Plato says in the Timaeus (which begins by summarizing the Republic), “Everyone of them would believe that they all make up a single family, and that all who fall within their own age bracket are their sisters and brothers, that those who are older, who fall in an earlier bracket are their parents or grandparents, while those who fall in a later one are their children or grandchildren.”[4] Or as Mormon said, “All children are alike unto me” (Moroni 8:17).

I argue here and here that Joseph Smith sought to implement shared marriages as well: or that originally both men and women could have multiple spouses. Such sharing would make allowances for procreation by the larger group that would transcend individuals’ procreative abilities.

[1] Plato, Symposium, 190-193.

[2] Plato, Symposium, 191e.

[3] Plato, Republic, 457c-d.

[4] Plato, Timaeus, 18d.

Article filed under Miscellaneous


Comments

  1. Interesting, as usual Steve. You’re last sentence is important for JS’s final year or so. Good stuff.

    Comment by WVS — January 11, 2016 @ 4:25 pm

  2. Only in the Celestial Kingdom…. It is inevitable. Only with perfect bodies and perfect love.

    Comment by RW — January 11, 2016 @ 5:21 pm

  3. Thanks, Steve, this is interesting.

    Comment by Saskia — January 11, 2016 @ 8:15 pm

  4. So, you have a quote from Jesus and then a few ideas from a few Greek folks, and you put more trust in the Greeks.

    Wasn’t it Greek ideas creeping into Christianity that are often blamed for causing the Great Apostasy?

    Comment by Jayman — January 11, 2016 @ 9:47 pm

  5. Thanks guys.

    Comment by Steve Fleming — January 12, 2016 @ 8:11 am


Series

Recent Comments

Ben on Call for Papers: 2018: “Do these get published anywhere? Is there a conference volume that appears?”


Devan Jensen on 2018 Church History Symposium:: “Regarding the timing, the Church History Symposium is regularly held that week. This year RootsTech joined us. We hope that many people can sample both…”


Dan Scheer on 2018 Church History Symposium:: “Will the proceedings of the conference be available via YouTube or some other media afterwards?”


rich jj on Clipping Words and Pasting: “Do I assume that the scrapbooks mentioned above are from the Journal History of the Church?”


acw on 2018 Church History Symposium:: “What odd timing to overlap with RootsTech (March 1-3), which surely draws some of the same attendees.”


wvs on Clipping Words and Pasting: “Fun post, Robin. I also look forward to reading the dissertation. Important work.”

Topics


juvenileinstructor.org