JI Summer Book Club 2017: A House Full of Females, Chapter 4

By June 26, 2017

This is the fourth entry in the Third Annual Summer Book Club at Juvenile Instructor. This year we are reading Laurel Thatcher Ulrich’s A House Full of Females: Plural Marriage and Women’s Rights in Early Mormonism (Knopf, 2017). Check back every Sunday for the week’s installment! Please follow the book club and JI on Facebook.

The introduction of polygamy during Nauvoo has received plenty of attention. Starting with Fawn Brodie’s exploration of Joseph Smith’s dozens of wives, scholars ranging from Todd Compton, Richard Bushman, George Smith, Brian Hales, Martha Bradley-Evans, Lawrence Foster, and Merina Smith have offered interpretations of the complex topic. The paucity of solid contemporary documents and proliferation of problematic reminiscences–not to mention the presence of teenage brides and polyandrous unions–make it a briar patch for writers. However, a common theme has dominated much of the general narrative: Joseph Smith, either divinely appointed of personally driven, sought to extend his sacerdotal connections through plural marriages. Fellow male leaders, eager to please their prophet and capitalize on his teachings, entered their own polygamous marriages. This secretive practice drew outside ire whenever rumors leaked, but internally it caused solidarity and strengthened loyalty. In this traditional framework, Nauvoo polygamy revolved around power and confidence.

Laurel Ulrich’s treatment of polygamy in her new book, A House Full of Females, bucks this trend. The novelty of the practice, secrecy of its introduction, and uncertainty of its participants highlights a different theme: anxiety. In Chapter 4, the focus of this week’s post, Ulrich looks at how polygamy expanded in the hands of Smith’s closest followers in Nauvoo. Between July 1842 and December 1844, the number of polygamists grew from Joseph Smith and Brigham Young to around twenty men and seventy-six women. Such numbers certainly brought growing pains. Ulrich seeks to capture the uncertainty of this experiment. As such, she eschews the later reminiscences which serve the bedrock of most scholarly treatments. “Autobiographies composed many years after the fact may exaggerate these sudden reversals,” she explains. These were events filled with confusion, ambition, and fear. Some were repulsed, but others were intrigued. Further, while many historians, critics, and apologists have focused on Smith’s own practice, Ulrich is more interested in those who surrounded the Prophet. This is a broader, and more complicated, story.

The leading characters of this chapter, William Clayton and the women he married, embody the ambiguities of this startling development. For Clayton, plural marriage provided a way to justify personal desires. Though married, he coveted a young woman, Sarah Crooks, whom she met while serving a mission in England. When he learned of the possibility of marrying Crooks, he wrote in his journal that it enabled him to obtain “a favor which I have long desired.” It seemed too good to be true. Worried that he might be pushing too hard, he sought assurance from the Prophet. “It is your privilege to have all the wives you want,” Smith returned. Clayton was provided the resources to help Crooks migrate from England. But Clayton was not satisfied with merely a second wife. While Crooks was in transit to Nauvoo, Clayton also married Margaret Moon, the younger sister of his first wife, Ruth. Clayton was ready to take advantage of his privileges.

But as Ulrich explains, things did not go smoothly. One can only imagine how each of these women reacted to his propositions. Things were complicated when Margaret, still quite young, had other suiters. Did Margaret return his affection? Clayton was never sure. Nor was he ever fully satisfied. After Crooks rejected his advances, Clayton approached a third Moon sister, Lydia, who was also courted by Smith himself. However, unlike the other Moon daughters, Lydia refused to enter a plural union. Clayton then turned his attention back to Margaret, whom he feared might choose a younger man over him. Eventually Margaret warmed to Clayton and even provided the first child born to a polygamous marriage. But that “happy” conclusion was far from assured. Throughout the entire courtship period, Clayton was in a constant state of worry. He worried about whether the women he was not sealed to were fully committed to him in turn. He worried about what Margaret and Ruth’s mother thought about these relationships. And finally, he worried about whether the Prophet approved of his actions. As Ulrich concludes,

Although William Clayton fits the model of a man who entered plural marriage because he was sexually attracted to multiple women, his diary suggests that he craved approval as much as sex. He wanted to be accepted not only by the women he loved, but by his hero Joseph Smith and by God.

Chapter 4 is a powerful exploration of the complex and contested nature of this supposedly well-known practice. As such, I’d argue it is the best depiction of Nauvoo polygamy yet written. At the very least, it captures the spirit of its uncertainty and anxiety. It puts flesh on the previous historiography’s previously dry skeleton.

A final note. One of the reasons Ulrich’s book was able to offer such a riveting account of polygamy in Nauvoo was she was granted full access to William Clayton’s diaries. That textual resource has a long history in the MHA world. The story of Clayton’s diaries in the past fifty years is full of stolen transcripts, published excerpts, and severely limited access. If you want an overview, read this exchange in Dialogue a couple decades ago. (I promise is a fascinating tale!) Though the Joseph Smith Papers Project was recently able to gain access for reference work while working on their Nauvoo volumes–you can find numerous references in Journals 2 and 3, as well as the Council of Fifty volume–the Clayton diaries remain closed to outside scholars. I don’t know why. Most of the “juicy” material is already out. All that’s still out of view is likely crucial insight on the social life of Mormon Nauvoo. I hope Ulrich is only the first of many historians who will eventually gain access to those diaries. Our treatments of Nauvoo will only benefit.


Article filed under Book and Journal Reviews Categories of Periodization: Origins Polygamy Summer Book Club


  1. Thanks, Ben. I agree–Ulrich captures the conflicted emotions that accompanied the emergence of plurality in Nauvoo better than perhaps anyone. She does have to rely primarily on a central male record keeper to do so, which has been a recurring criticism that I’ve heard of the book, but I don’t see that as a major flaw, since Clayton (like Woodruff) is a window that illuminates female and male reactions to the principle in fascinating ways.

    Comment by David G. — June 26, 2017 @ 6:52 am

  2. Thanks, David. And yes, there are trade-offs when privileging contemporary documents–there are less female voices from which to reconstruct female lives. This is mostly a problem in the earliest chapters in the book, as there are plenty of female voices from 1845 on.

    Comment by Ben P — June 26, 2017 @ 7:38 am

  3. Really helpful summary, Ben. Laurel does a great job with a very difficult subject.

    You write that the Claytons produced the first child born to a polygamous marriage. I thought the first child was Adelbert Kimball, born ca. 1842 to Sarah Noon and Heber C. Kimball. Maybe the Claytons’ children was the first to survive to adulthood?

    Also, Laurel’s access to the original Clayton Nauvoo diaries should be a positive sign of future cooperation. However, my recent request for one entry was denied.

    Comment by Gary Bergera — June 26, 2017 @ 8:16 am

  4. Thanks, Ben. Really helpful.

    This reminds me of something you wrote in last year’s book club: women historians like Ulrich, Newell, and Avery capture the emotive realities of early polygamy better than men. There’s no way around it.

    Comment by J Stuart — June 26, 2017 @ 8:31 am

  5. Gary: thanks for the reminder of the Kimball baby. That’s what I get for writing late at night.

    Thanks, Joey.

    Comment by Ben P — June 26, 2017 @ 8:54 am

  6. I thought the first child was Adelbert Kimball, born ca. 1842 to Sarah Noon and Heber C. Kimball. Maybe the Claytons’ children was the first to survive to adulthood?

    Gary, Ulrich is skeptical that Heber C. Kimball and Sarah Noon had a child in 1842, based on a close reading (between the lines) of Vilate Kimball to Heber C. Kimball, 29 June 1843 (p. 100). She suggests in an adjacent footnote that the Kimball family tradition is based on Helen Mar Kimball Whitney’s later reminiscence and that contemporary sources do not support it (417n67). She also mentions that the Noble family has long claimed the first child born to a plural union, a boy named Alley on 2 Feb. 1844 (417n66).

    Comment by David G. — June 28, 2017 @ 6:38 am

  7. Thanks, David. Adelmon/Adelbert H. Noon died, age six months, sometime during the week ending April 24, 1843. This is according to his very brief obituary in The Wasp, 1 (Apr. 26, 1843):3. Six months old at time of death would have put his birth in October/November 1842.

    Comment by Gary Bergera — June 28, 2017 @ 3:19 pm

  8. I avoided the subject of polygamy for years because it was so hard on a “testimony.” A few years back I ran into “An Intimate Chronicle, the Journals of William Clayton” edited by George D. Smith. I mean for $1 at a used book store I couldn’t say no – Lol. Now I read the rest of his materials are still not available. With Hales bringing out the three vols on polygamy and so many other single texts, I also would think they would make access available to all of it. We can always hope we are dead by the time that day comes. It is a remarkable subject. I also just recently acquired Compton’s “In Sacred Lonliness,” and will eventually read it. I have browsed and he seems to have a fascinating angle on the entire issue. Some great info in this review, Thanks!

    Comment by Kerry A. Shirts — July 6, 2017 @ 10:18 pm

  9. […] now available Ben Spackman, “MHA Presentation and Reconciling Science with Scripture” Joseph Stuart, “Patriarchal Blessings, Lineage, and Race: Historical Background and a Survey&#… Ben Park, “JI Summer Book Club 2017: A House Full of Females, Chapter 4” Clark Goble, […]

    Pingback by THIS MONTH IN MORMON STUDIES: The podcast that addresses the latest happenings in the field of Mormon studies | Mormon Life Hacker — July 7, 2017 @ 5:27 pm

  10. I have always liked Ben. I am looking forward to reading his paper. Thanks for the heads up. He is one of the more decent and well read in biblical studies. I reviewed or rather interviewed him once at one of the FAIR conferences, and he was a hoot. Had been studying Hebrew for several years and was just an all around nice guy.

    Comment by Kerry A. Shirts — July 7, 2017 @ 8:20 pm


Recent Comments

David G. on Review: The Thirteenth Apostle:: “Thanks, Joey!”

J Stuart on Review: The Thirteenth Apostle:: “Thanks, JR! The post has been updated. That's what I get for reviewing books at 1 in the morning.”

JR on Review: The Thirteenth Apostle:: “At least once - maybe only once - your review names "Partridge" when I think you meant "Lyman". See 4th paragraph. If that's…”

Quincy D. Newell on Review: The Council of: “Matt, thanks for the book suggestion—I’ll check it out. I agree that it would be really helpful to know how things have changed over…”

SC Taysom on "The Heathen World and: “KGL is one of my YSAR colleagues! You landed a real gem this time.”

Steve Fleming on Thoughts on PBS'S Wolf: “Right, but I wonder if a particular agenda is more a motivation to write these kinds of works than simply a desire for accuracy.”