Thanks, BiV

By February 5, 2008

We’ve enjoyed having Bored in Vernal as our guest over the last little bit. Her posts have been insightful and based on solid research. She has also brought a much needed feminist perspective to our discussions of the Mormon past. We’d like to give her a big thanks for sharing some of her insights with us.

Article filed under Miscellaneous


Comments

  1. Thanks for your contributions, BiV. I second David’s assessment and praise.

    Comment by Christopher — February 5, 2008 @ 5:06 pm

  2. Thanks for your thoughtful posts. You should write up that post from the other day; a lot of good material in it.

    Comment by smb — February 5, 2008 @ 5:39 pm

  3. Cheers!

    Comment by J. Stapley — February 5, 2008 @ 6:02 pm

  4. Thanks, all. SMB, I’ll do it. Thank you for the encouragement.

    Comment by Bored in Vernal — February 6, 2008 @ 12:24 am

  5. I was very impressed with your guest posts for their thought provoking ideas. I noticed that you had the most comments of any blogger on JI to date which is a major achievement. You have one of the largest following on the bloggernacle for your analytical treatment of subjects. I like it when the commentator does some analysis rather than throws out a few historical facts. Congratulations on your posts here and I will continue reading you at notapostate.blogspot.com.

    Comment by Dr. B. — February 7, 2008 @ 10:21 pm


Series

Recent Comments

Steve Fleming on BH Roberts on Plato: “Interesting, Jack. But just to reiterate, I think JS saw the SUPPRESSION of Platonic ideas as creating the loss of truth and not the addition.…”


Jack on BH Roberts on Plato: “Thanks for your insights--you've really got me thinking. I can't get away from the notion that the formation of the Great and Abominable church was an…”


Steve Fleming on BH Roberts on Plato: “In the intro to DC 76 in JS's 1838 history, JS said, "From sundry revelations which had been received, it was apparent that many important…”


Jack on BH Roberts on Plato: “"I’ve argued that God’s corporality isn’t that clear in the NT, so it seems to me that asserting that claims of God’s immateriality happened AFTER…”


Steve Fleming on Study and Faith, 5:: “The burden of proof is on the claim of there BEING Nephites. From a scholarly point of view, the burden of proof is on the…”


Eric on Study and Faith, 5:: “But that's not what I was saying about the nature of evidence of an unknown civilization. I am talking about linguistics, not ruins. …”

Topics


juvenileinstructor.org