“A Window into Joseph Smith’s Translation: An Exploration of the Book of Abraham Manuscripts”

By January 3, 2019

Maxwell Institute Lecture

Robin Jensen and Brian Hauglid

Friday, January 11, 2019, 3:00 pm

Gordon B. Hinckley Alumni & Visitors Center, Brigham Young University

Some of the most puzzling documents left in the wake of Joseph Smith’s prophetic career pertain tot he Book of Abraham–from the ancient papyrus to the nineteenth-century notebooks. For over a century these documents were specially housed away from public view. In 2018 the Joseph Smith Papers Project team published the documents in Revelations and Translations, vol. 4.

Robin Scott Jensen and Brian M. Hauglid co-edited the landmark volume. In the process, they learned more about the origins and uses of the cryptic Egyptian papers which Joseph Smith and his associates worked on beginning in the mid 1830s. Jensen and Hauglid will discuss what they learned to shed more light on Joseph Smith’s processes of translation in this lecture.

Article filed under Announcements and Events


Comments

  1. Perhaps Hauglid will explain his recent Facebook announcement in terms that aren’t quite so “apocalyptic”. Will there be a Q & A

    Comment by Terry H — January 4, 2019 @ 5:39 pm

  2. Both Hauglid and Jensen’s talks were well done. Hauglid first walked through the artifacts that essentially killed the long scroll theory, the missing fragment thory, or the notion that JS didn’t claim that Abraham’s own hand writings were on the papyrus. Robin then took to to venture what possibly might have been going on inside JS’s head.

    Comment by VFanRJ — January 18, 2019 @ 11:22 am


Series

Recent Comments

Steve Fleming on BH Roberts on Plato: “Interesting, Jack. But just to reiterate, I think JS saw the SUPPRESSION of Platonic ideas as creating the loss of truth and not the addition.…”


Jack on BH Roberts on Plato: “Thanks for your insights--you've really got me thinking. I can't get away from the notion that the formation of the Great and Abominable church was an…”


Steve Fleming on BH Roberts on Plato: “In the intro to DC 76 in JS's 1838 history, JS said, "From sundry revelations which had been received, it was apparent that many important…”


Jack on BH Roberts on Plato: “"I’ve argued that God’s corporality isn’t that clear in the NT, so it seems to me that asserting that claims of God’s immateriality happened AFTER…”


Steve Fleming on Study and Faith, 5:: “The burden of proof is on the claim of there BEING Nephites. From a scholarly point of view, the burden of proof is on the…”


Eric on Study and Faith, 5:: “But that's not what I was saying about the nature of evidence of an unknown civilization. I am talking about linguistics, not ruins. …”

Topics


juvenileinstructor.org