“A Window into Joseph Smith’s Translation: An Exploration of the Book of Abraham Manuscripts”

By January 3, 2019

Maxwell Institute Lecture

Robin Jensen and Brian Hauglid

Friday, January 11, 2019, 3:00 pm

Gordon B. Hinckley Alumni & Visitors Center, Brigham Young University

Some of the most puzzling documents left in the wake of Joseph Smith’s prophetic career pertain tot he Book of Abraham–from the ancient papyrus to the nineteenth-century notebooks. For over a century these documents were specially housed away from public view. In 2018 the Joseph Smith Papers Project team published the documents in Revelations and Translations, vol. 4.

Robin Scott Jensen and Brian M. Hauglid co-edited the landmark volume. In the process, they learned more about the origins and uses of the cryptic Egyptian papers which Joseph Smith and his associates worked on beginning in the mid 1830s. Jensen and Hauglid will discuss what they learned to shed more light on Joseph Smith’s processes of translation in this lecture.

Article filed under Announcements and Events


  1. Perhaps Hauglid will explain his recent Facebook announcement in terms that aren’t quite so “apocalyptic”. Will there be a Q & A

    Comment by Terry H — January 4, 2019 @ 5:39 pm

  2. Both Hauglid and Jensen’s talks were well done. Hauglid first walked through the artifacts that essentially killed the long scroll theory, the missing fragment thory, or the notion that JS didn’t claim that Abraham’s own hand writings were on the papyrus. Robin then took to to venture what possibly might have been going on inside JS’s head.

    Comment by VFanRJ — January 18, 2019 @ 11:22 am


Recent Comments

Ben S on Call for Applicants: Mormon: “Dang. Missing it by 36 hours.”

John Turner on What's in a name?: “Titles are hard because they serve so many purposes, as several of you have mentioned. I am also agonizing about my current project (it's a…”

Ben P on What's in a name?: “These are good questions, Janiece. I suck at coming up with titles, so I often rely on others. (Ironically, it was John Turner who came…”

JJohnson on What's in a name?: “I'm not so much opposed to the pithy quote title formula, as I am impressed when a non-semi-colon title is able to accomplish as much…”

J Stuart on What's in a name?: “I may stand alone but I like the pithy quote title formula, so long as it isn't too obscure. I think it's what the book…”

JJohnson on What's in a name?: “Secularism in Antebellum America's subtitle wins everything.”