Announcing “Scholaristas”: A new blog exploring women’s religious history

By July 28, 2010

As promised, former JI blogger Elizabeth has teamed up with two other bright and thoughtful young historians of American religion to create a new and sorely needed blog. We are pleased to announce and endorse Scholaristas, a blog devoted to the study of women’s religious history by women. The bloggers describe themselves and their blog as follows:

As the title of this blog suggests, we are ladies with multiple layers. We are scholars who love strappy heals, vintage dresses, and cute purses. We are also scholars who take an academic interest in women?in their history and in their place in the world today. This virtual forum is a place for us discuss the things, silly and serious, that are on our minds. It will likely focus on women?s religious history but may occasionally wander into other realms of inquiry.  We hope you?ll join the discussion and make this a pleasant place to be.

Amanda, recent Mormon Scholars Foundation Summer Seminarian and PhD student at the University of Michigan, has put up the inaugural post, an intriguing retrospective of Dialogue‘s Pink Issue. She concludes by asking:

Although there has been a lot of work done on women?s history within the L.D.S. Church, such scholarship has not permeated the general membership.  I think the interesting question is not about the fact that many young girls and women are not versed in this scholarship but is about the circumstances that have led them to be so.  Why are feminist scholars still able to tell stories about young women who approach them after lectures to say that they ? at the age of twenty-two, twenty-three, or twenty-four ? had not realized that Mormon women had been involved in the movement for women?s rights in the nineteenth century or that Eliza Snow had been so important in early Mormonism?  Why when many Mormon students are challenged about the position of women within Church do they rarely cite the existence of the Woman?s Exponent in the 1870s or the development of Mormon feminism a hundred years later in the 1970s?  Why has the influence of feminist scholarship on Mormon women been limited to a small circle of church members?

Head on over and join in the conversation, and be sure to bookmark the site and stay current on what promises to be an intelligent, thoughtful, and important contribution to the Mormon and religion blogging communities.

Article filed under Announcements and Events Gender


Comments

  1. Thanks, Chris. Your supportiveness always warms my heart!

    Comment by Elizabeth — July 28, 2010 @ 12:56 pm

  2. Glad to help in some small way, Liz. I look forward to your efforts.

    Comment by Christopher — July 28, 2010 @ 2:25 pm

  3. Congratulations and best wishes!

    Comment by Edje Jeter — July 28, 2010 @ 5:10 pm

  4. I look forward to following the blog.

    Comment by J. Stapley — July 29, 2010 @ 10:35 am


Series

Recent Comments

Steve Fleming on BH Roberts on Plato: “Interesting, Jack. But just to reiterate, I think JS saw the SUPPRESSION of Platonic ideas as creating the loss of truth and not the addition.…”


Jack on BH Roberts on Plato: “Thanks for your insights--you've really got me thinking. I can't get away from the notion that the formation of the Great and Abominable church was an…”


Steve Fleming on BH Roberts on Plato: “In the intro to DC 76 in JS's 1838 history, JS said, "From sundry revelations which had been received, it was apparent that many important…”


Jack on BH Roberts on Plato: “"I’ve argued that God’s corporality isn’t that clear in the NT, so it seems to me that asserting that claims of God’s immateriality happened AFTER…”


Steve Fleming on Study and Faith, 5:: “The burden of proof is on the claim of there BEING Nephites. From a scholarly point of view, the burden of proof is on the…”


Eric on Study and Faith, 5:: “But that's not what I was saying about the nature of evidence of an unknown civilization. I am talking about linguistics, not ruins. …”

Topics


juvenileinstructor.org