Announcing the First Juvenile Instructoress

By February 20, 2008

We’ve heard rumors that other blogs have been conspiring to nab Heidi, our latest guest blogger, to be a permablogger elsewhere. Not to burst anyone’s bubble, but such conspiracies are bound to fail. Heidi has accepted our invitation to stay with us as, in her words, the “first Juvenile Instructoress.” Unfortunately, she has made some kind of strange pact for Lent about giving up blogging, and so we must wait until March 22 for her to start as an official permablogger (although she assures us that she will finish out her guest stint). But regardless, we wanted to let everyone know and begin the congratulations process.

Article filed under Miscellaneous


Comments

  1. Welcome aboard, Heidi. Good luck with Lent.

    Comment by Christopher — February 20, 2008 @ 9:43 pm

  2. Welcome welcome. Its always good to have another Transcendentalist…

    Comment by Ben — February 20, 2008 @ 9:50 pm

  3. I had a friend in high school who gave up Catholicism for Lent.

    Anyway, nice choice for the First Instructoress. I’m looking forward to your contributions.

    Comment by Ray — February 20, 2008 @ 10:03 pm

  4. So Heidi, do you only blog after sun down during Ramadan?

    Welcome aboard!

    Comment by stan — February 21, 2008 @ 10:34 am

  5. I have heard of an Instructor and an Instructress, but what is an Instructoress?

    Comment by Justin — February 21, 2008 @ 10:58 am

  6. I think that Heidi has just invented a neologism…

    Comment by David G. — February 21, 2008 @ 11:36 am

  7. stan- and not on fast Sundays either.

    Justin- an instructoress…is…um…::looks around frantically trying to come up with a cool, smart, appropriately ironic response::…um….it’s…me?

    Comment by Heidi — February 21, 2008 @ 12:59 pm

  8. I should have checked previously using Google books, but it appears that the term has been around.

    Comment by Justin — February 21, 2008 @ 2:13 pm

  9. Exonerated from grammatical ruin by Justin!

    Comment by Heidi — February 21, 2008 @ 6:16 pm

  10. Congrats!

    Comment by BHodges — February 25, 2008 @ 5:53 pm


Series

Recent Comments

Steve Fleming on BH Roberts on Plato: “Interesting, Jack. But just to reiterate, I think JS saw the SUPPRESSION of Platonic ideas as creating the loss of truth and not the addition.…”


Jack on BH Roberts on Plato: “Thanks for your insights--you've really got me thinking. I can't get away from the notion that the formation of the Great and Abominable church was an…”


Steve Fleming on BH Roberts on Plato: “In the intro to DC 76 in JS's 1838 history, JS said, "From sundry revelations which had been received, it was apparent that many important…”


Jack on BH Roberts on Plato: “"I’ve argued that God’s corporality isn’t that clear in the NT, so it seems to me that asserting that claims of God’s immateriality happened AFTER…”


Steve Fleming on Study and Faith, 5:: “The burden of proof is on the claim of there BEING Nephites. From a scholarly point of view, the burden of proof is on the…”


Eric on Study and Faith, 5:: “But that's not what I was saying about the nature of evidence of an unknown civilization. I am talking about linguistics, not ruins. …”

Topics


juvenileinstructor.org