The 58th Annual Conference of the Mormon History Association will be June 8-11, 2023, in Rochester, New York. The 2023 conference theme, “Beginnings” intends to evoke the many beginnings in Mormon history. Those beginnings include Joseph Smith’s first vision and the establishment of the Church of Christ in upstate New York, but also the many other firsts throughout the faith’s subsequent history. As this American religious tradition has grown from a fledgling church to a global movement with multiple expressions, it has attracted followers and critics, nurtured disciples and dissenters, and generated gatherings and schisms. It has, in many respects, begun over and over again.
Change is a key tenet of Mormonism, from its birth in the fires of the revivals of the early nineteenth century to its introduction of new teachings, policies, and organizations as it expanded its reach and extended its influence. Individually and institutionally, the faith and its practitioners have wrestled with the shifting theological, social, and political issues of American and global history, navigating and adapting in response to slavery and abolition, political opposition toward religious practices, the struggle for women’s rights, the emergence of the United States as a global military and political force, and, more recently, the fight for LGBTQ+ rights and growing political polarization around the world.
My thanks to series editors J Stuart and Cristina for their edits and comments on this post.
I haven’t read Under the Banner of Heaven; this post is about responses to the book that I have heard. After reading the book, my sister shared with the family her take on the book’s claim of the dangers of believing in personal revelation (Jana Riess makes the same observation about Krakauer’s claim in her review), and it was at that point that I began formulating what I’d observed from studying the history of Christianity: there’s been a long history of people being very worried about other people claiming revelations. No doubt such claims got Jesus in trouble as they did Socrates. After studying this topic in considerable depth, I’d say the worry of the potential threat of visionaries vastly outstrips the actual damage of such people, and thus it looks to me like Under the Banner of Heaven is a popular manifestation of an ancient claim.
John Hatch is an editor for Signature Books. He is currently writing “What Do You Mean, Murder?” Clue and the Making of a Cult Classic to be published in 2023.
Banner of Heaven is frequently criticized—not unfairly, it must be said—by historians of Mormonism for its inaccurate history and its willingness to engage in guilt-by-association. Author Jon Krakauer’s thesis seems that if extremists like the Lafferty brothers are murdering people, we ought to be suspicious of John and Jane Mormon, whose roots can be traced back to the same violent origins. The line between mainstream and fundamentalist, Krakauer not-so-subtly suggests, is mighty thin. While these criticisms of the book’s questionable history and shaky thesis are valid, I believe they are also used to mask a defensiveness that many Mormons feel about Under the Banner of Heaven. It is difficult not to detect a more visceral reaction to the book than just, “This gets our history wrong.” Inaccuracies aside, most Latter-day Saints dislike it because they don’t recognize themselves in it. They feel like it is not an authentic portrayal of their lived experience in the LDS faith, and no one wants to be told “this is who you are,” when it sure doesn’t feel like that is who I am. Some of this is because the book is, in fact, not authentic to the Mormon experience with its clumsy attempt to link violent extremists with the average LDS churchgoer. But some of this feeling that the book is not accurate is because Latter-day Saints are notoriously bad at understanding how they come across to outsiders. Many people think Mormons are weird and Mormons neither understand that nor particularly like it.
In 2003, John Krakauer’s Under the Banner of Heaven hit bookshelves and became an overnight sensation. The story is a is the true-crime bestseller about two men who made headlines after a double murder shook a suburban Utah town. The men, Dan and Ron Lafferty, were raised in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, but joined the School of the Prophets, a small Mormon fundamentalist group that understood themselves to be the most authentic remnant of the nineteenth-century faith.
Since its publication, the discussion around Banner never stopped. It consistently ranks among the five best-selling books on Mormonism on Amazon. It’s often the first book that non-Mormons will turn to in order to understand their Mormon (usually Latter-day Saint) neighbors). While it’s foolhardy to judge an entire population by a single book, much less one written nearly twenty years ago, it doesn’t stop well-meaning people from recommending it as an authoritative text on Mormonism or Mormon history.
Shirlee Draper was born and raised in Colorado City, Arizona, within the fundamentalist polygamous sect now known as FLDS. She was “placed” in an arranged marriage and had four children. She holds an MA in Public Administration and is currently the Director of Operations for Cherish Families and the Board President for the United Effort Plan Trust.
My Dad died last month. His health had been steadily degrading along with his mental faculties for a couple of years, so it was not unexpected. In writing his eulogy, I reflected at length on what a wretched life he lived—not of his making. You see, Dad had the misfortune to be born into what society has deemed a “Deviant” community, and culture. He was born of goodly parents—who practiced polygamy. Their goodly parents had, too, and on and on back about a century.
The week Dad turned 12, he and all the other children in his community (that would come to be known as “the FLDS”) were rounded up in the 1953 Raid on Short Creek. The history of this raid has been told so I won’t do it here. But I will draw attention to the CDC-Kaiser ACE Study[i] which demonstrates the very poor life outcomes of children who suffer trauma in their youth. Dad exhibited nearly every one of the poor outcomes on the list of projected issues created by ACEs. One of the manifestations of his trauma was his unswerving belief that his children would be taken from him if he accepted help, if we participated in extracurricular activities, or if we ventured outside our community. These fears directly impacted his children’s life opportunities. Dealing with my dad’s death and the way he raised his children because of his early trauma really sharpened the sense of injustice I harbor regarding the way “cults” are treated.
Cristina Rosetti is an Assistant Professor of Humanities at Dixie State University. Her research focuses on the history and lived experience of Mormon fundamentalists in the Intermountain West. Her book St. Joseph W. Musser: A Mormon Prophet will be published by the University of Illinois Press in 2023.
In the first episode of Under the Banner of Heaven, an Idaho mother looks at her son and tells him, “It’s you. You’re the fulfillment of Heavenly Father’s promise that he would send One Mighty and Strong to set things in order. And he sent me six mighty and strong, but you’re my one.” The One Mighty and Strong is a term that comes from Doctrine and Covenants 85 and is most often associated with Joseph Smith. However, in some families, like the one depicted in Banner, this is a title and claim that transforms a man into a prophet. Notorious men like Bryan David Mitchell, Ron and Dan Lafferty, and Evril LeBaron all claimed the title. But, beyond the notorious, I know a man who was given the title in his patriarchal blessing. I know former Latter-day Saint men who believe they are called to set the house of God in order. Even now, as portrayed by Dustin Lance Black, mothers tell their sons they are the One.
In my first piece for Juvenile Instructor, published nearly nine years ago, I called Jon Krakauer’s Under the Banner of Heaven “inexorable.” A white man on the internet popped up–as white men often seem to do–to tell me I meant “execrable.”
To be sure, Banner is also detestable for many reasons, but I meant what I said and I said what I meant. Banner is unstoppable, terrible, fear-inspiring, and inescapable. At the time I was writing, a full decade after its initial publication, no one commenting on Mormonism(s) in public could escape being asked about Krakauer’s devilishly well written, disastrously ill considered treatise on “violent faith.”
Bryan Buchanan works at Benchmark Books in Salt Lake City and is the co-host of the Sunstone Mormon History Podcast. He edited Continuing Revelation: Essays on Doctrine (2021) and is working on several forthcoming projects that illuminate the history of post-Manifesto polygamy.
When copies of Jon Krakauer’s fourth book—Under the Banner of Heaven (published by Doubleday) started hitting bookshelves in mid-July 2003, it was a noteworthy event, particularly in the Mormon world. Sales here at Benchmark Books in Salt Lake City were modest—only about twenty copies in the first month—but part of the problem was that the first printing was gone quickly. The general response to the book, both then and now, has been robust and consistent. For many non-Mormon readers, this is their first (and perhaps only) exposure to Mormon culture, theology and—importantly—history. Now, nearly twenty years after publication, the original context in which the book was introduced is frequently overlooked.
The current swirl of Mormon Studies publications, both print and digital, is dizzying. Various projects have brought a wealth of resources to the fingers of researchers. In 2003, though, writer Jon Krakauer faced a very different landscape. Within his envisioned scope for the book was a challenging array of topics: Joseph Smith, Mountain Meadows, the rise of fundamentalist Mormons, violence, and, finally, the specific story of the Lafferty family. To properly assess the place and impact of Krakauer’s work, it is worth looking at where Banner landed within this larger publishing history.
Erik Freeman is the Draper Dissertation Fellow at the University of Connecticut’s Humanities Institute and a doctoral candidate in UConn’s Department of History. He will defend his dissertation on nineteenth-century transnational Mormon communitarianism in July 2022. Erik’s article “‘True Christianity’: The Flowering and Fading of Mormonism and Romantic Socialism in Nineteenth-Century France,” won the Best Article Award at the Communal Studies Association’s annual conference in 2018, and the Best International Article Award from the Mormon Historical Association in 2019.
On September 11, 2001, religious zealots flew airplanes into New York City’s World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and a field in Pennsylvania. These events led many Americans to ask questions about how religion and violence converge, particularly through visceral events with clear perpetrators. Krakauer wrote Under the Banner of Heaven (2003) in the wake of these violent events. Krakauer engages readers with a true-crime story from the 1980s about two Mormon fundamentalist brothers who murdered their sister-in-law and niece, claiming it was the will of God. Yet Krakauer’s book is far more than a work of true-crime journalism; it explores big questions about the intersection between religion, violence, and politics, both past and present. It is also a sweeping and controversial work of history that portrays Mormonism as fundamentally American, politicly conservative, religiously fanatical, and violent. When Krakauer looks at Mormonism’s past and present in the American West, he sees blood everywhere.
Craig L. Foster holds a MA and MLIS from Brigham Young University. He is an accredited genealogist and works as a research consultant at the Family History Library in Salt Lake City. He is widely published on subjects related to the history of Mormonism, broadly defined, and along with Marianne Watson is the author ofAmerican Polygamy: A History of Fundamentalist Mormon Faith.
In 2003, Jon Krakauer published his book Under the Banner of Heaven: A Story of Violent Faith. Krakauer’s work became an instant sensation. After almost twenty years, it continues to be, in the words of Max Perry Mueller, “the bestselling book on Mormon history in recent memory.”[i] Unfortunately, “best-selling” does not make a book “best.” That’s why in 2004, I published a review of Krakauer’s book titled, “Doing Violence to Journalistic Integrity.”[ii]
The title of my review was a simple, and perhaps unsuccessful, attempt at being witty. As I stated there, Jon Krakauer is “a gifted writer [whose] text flows seamlessly, creating a literary picture that touches a reader to the very core.” But his book is seriously flawed through a combination of ignorance about the subject and his blatant bias, for which I not only took him to task in the review, but which also inspired the title.
Steve Fleming on Study and Faith, 5:: “The burden of proof is on the claim of there BEING Nephites. From a scholarly point of view, the burden of proof is on the…”
Eric on Study and Faith, 5:: “But that's not what I was saying about the nature of evidence of an unknown civilization. I am talking about linguistics, not ruins. …”
Steve Fleming on Study and Faith, 5:: “Large civilizations leave behind evidence of their existence. For instance, I just read that scholars estimate the kingdom of Judah to have been around 110,000…”
Eric on Study and Faith, 5:: “I have always understood the key to issues with Nephite archeology to be language. Besides the fact that there is vastly more to Mesoamerican…”
Steven Borup on In Memoriam: James B.: “Bro Allen was the lead coordinator in 1980 for the BYU Washington, DC Seminar and added valuable insights into American history as we also toured…”
David G. on In Memoriam: James B.: “Jim was a legend who impacted so many through his scholarship and kind mentoring. He'll be missed.”
Recent Comments
Steve Fleming on Study and Faith, 5:: “The burden of proof is on the claim of there BEING Nephites. From a scholarly point of view, the burden of proof is on the…”
Eric on Study and Faith, 5:: “But that's not what I was saying about the nature of evidence of an unknown civilization. I am talking about linguistics, not ruins. …”
Steve Fleming on Study and Faith, 5:: “Large civilizations leave behind evidence of their existence. For instance, I just read that scholars estimate the kingdom of Judah to have been around 110,000…”
Eric on Study and Faith, 5:: “I have always understood the key to issues with Nephite archeology to be language. Besides the fact that there is vastly more to Mesoamerican…”
Steven Borup on In Memoriam: James B.: “Bro Allen was the lead coordinator in 1980 for the BYU Washington, DC Seminar and added valuable insights into American history as we also toured…”
David G. on In Memoriam: James B.: “Jim was a legend who impacted so many through his scholarship and kind mentoring. He'll be missed.”