Converting Kirtland: Spiritual Gifts and the Book of Mormon

By August 6, 2012

By Pete Wosnik

This week I’ve been reading through primary sources of converts to Mormonism who lived in Kirtland- and the surrounding counties- in 1830. In my initial research, I have used boap.org and saintswithouthalos.com to examine narratives by Levi Hancock, Lyman Wight, and Josiah Jones. Saintswithouthalos.com also has the Ohio 1830 census uploaded which has proven to be very helpful. I’ve also consulted Staker’s Hearken O Ye People, Givens and Grow’s Parley P. Pratt: The Apostle Paul of Mormonism, and Van Wagoner’s Sidney Rigdon: Portrait of Religious Excess. These resources have laid a groundwork for my thesis; however, I plan to consult original documents and other sources in the archives at BYU, U of U, and the CHL.

My findings so far have been in some ways consistent with my original thesis, that early Mormons were most compelled theologically by religious charisma, while in other ways the sources tell a different story. I have struggled finding many direct allusions to excitement about religious charisma from convert narratives, but I have found other telling evidence I will explicate here.

Key to this project is an understanding of the religious backgrounds of Parley P. Pratt and Sidney Rigdon, since their influence on conversion in the Western Reserve was paramount. Both Pratt and Rigdon saw spiritual gifts as necessary to the restoration of primitive Christianity. Rigdon had several public disagreements with Alexander Campbell through newspaper articles. And Pratt disagreed with a leader of a Baptist congregation over the essentiality of modern-day religious charisma (Givens and Grow, 26). The two men viewed other theological principles as compelling: Pratt was interested in the authority Mormonism provided, preaching to the American Indians, and the gathering of Israel; for Rigdon, Mormonism confirmed his views of pre-millennialism and provided him with the Book of Mormon which gave him answers to pertinent theological quandaries.

Rigdon and Pratt, while both mentioning spiritual gifts as being important to their worldview, were most drawn to Mormonism by the Book of Mormon. Pratt, after reading the Book of Mormon, was converted to Mormonism before he ever met with Joseph Smith. It is no surprise, then, that the converts in the Western Reserve emphasized the Book of Mormon being essential to their conversions. Lyman Wight’s simple narrative was archetypal of Kirtland conversions: “We called meeting and one testified that he had seen angels, and another that had seen the plates, and that the gifts were back in the church again… The meeting became so interesting withal that I did not get away till the sun was about an hour high at night.” Additionally, Wight testified in a conference in 1831 that he had, “seen the savior.” Levi Hancock, in a more enthusiastic way, wrote about his response upon hearing the news of the Book of Mormon: “At these last words I gathered faith and there seemed to fall on me something pleasant and delightful. It seemed like a wash of something warm took me in the face and ran over my body which gave me a feeling I cannot describe. The first word I said was, ‘It is the truth, I can feel it.'” Hancock’s account of spiritual experience points to a larger spiritual phenomenon in Kirtland in the 1830. A local citizen, Josiah Jones, was one of the few members in Kirtland that stayed true to his Campbellite convictions, and in 1831 he wrote an account of the history of Mormonism in the area. He emphasized the enthusiastic religion of the early members. He cited attempted healings, prophesying, visions, dramatic reception of the spirit, speaking in tongues, and other spiritual practices that permeated the religious lives of the new converts. And while Jones’s bias must be taken to account, his observation of the period seem to be generally accurate.

While most of the narratives emphasize the Book of Mormon, rather than charisma, as a reason for conversion, undoubtedly, religious enthusiasm played a large role in early Mormonism in Kirtland. The Book of Mormon itself may have added to the religious enthusiasm in Kirtland. When Cowdrey explained the book to the citizens of Kirtland, he mentioned the angel Moroni, its translation from ancient plates by a supernatural power, and the authority received to baptize and confirm the holy ghost. The text of the Book of Mormon is also filled with stories of the miraculous, and God dealing directly in the lives of people. For Kirtland citizens, accepting the Book of Mormon meant believing in contemporary revelatory experience. The acceptance of these beliefs may have augmented their religious enthusiasm.

Article filed under Categories of Periodization: Origins Cultural History


Comments

  1. I think of the many things that the Book of Mormon is, it is an anti-cessationist manifesto.

    Comment by J. Stapley — August 6, 2012 @ 1:16 pm

  2. Good stuff, Pete. I’m excited to see your project continue to develop. And I think J. is absolutely right. David Holland’s Sacred Borders might be useful in thinking about this.

    Comment by Christopher — August 6, 2012 @ 1:34 pm

  3. Looks good, Pete. I’m thinking of making debates between Campbell and Rigdon over cessation central to my dissertation (or at least the introduction). It all fits in with points I want to make about Neoplatonism in JS’s environment.

    Comment by Steve Fleming — August 6, 2012 @ 3:58 pm

  4. I’ve been mining British newspapers for Mormon references from the first couple of decades of Mormon presence in Great Britain. You can tell, sometimes directly from the elders themselves, but most often filtered through the mocking press, what the elders were teaching, debating, and practicing. These points are consistently that the heavens are opened again (as evidenced by the existence of the Book of Mormon), and that signs (specifically healing, tongues, and the giving of the gift of the Holy Ghost through the laying on of hands) will follow believers in the true gospel.

    My idea is that since these men were either elders directly from Kirtland in a few cases, or were the first converts of such men, their teachings probably reflect what was most important to that Kirtland generation. It’s a couple of steps removed from your thesis, but if you think it would be useful I would be happy to share some specific examples.

    Comment by Ardis E. Parshall — August 6, 2012 @ 6:22 pm

  5. Stapley,
    I kind of see the BoM as being a text that kind of gave the go-ahead for converts to start seeking spiritual gifts.

    Christopher,
    I read your review of that Book here on JI, looks great. Also, I’m having the USU library order it.

    Steve,
    Are you referring specifically to platonic epistemology? Also, I found records of these debates in Staker, but his footnotes didn’t help me locate the actual sources. Do you know where I could find them?
    Thanks

    Ardis,
    I would be very interested in seeing some of those examples.

    Comment by Pete Wosnik — August 7, 2012 @ 1:07 am

  6. All I have at this point are the standard stuff so far: Campbell’s critiques of Mormonism and Rigdon’s articles in the Messenger and Advocate. I’m not going to get too far into the debates, but I’m looking at how they understood the apostasy in terms of Christian Platonism v. cessation.

    Comment by Steve Fleming — August 7, 2012 @ 8:15 am

  7. Great work, Pete. I’m especially interested in what you find relating to the Book of Mormon in the conversion narratives. As you likely know, there’s a minor historiographical debate over how much the early Saints used the text itself, as opposed to seeing the BoM primarily as a sacred sign of the impending millennium. Be sure to note not only that they’re citing in their narratives, but also what verses they’re citing, since our ways of reading the text are not always how they read in the 1830s.

    Comment by David G. — August 7, 2012 @ 10:45 am

  8. Sounds like a great project, Pete. Good luck as you continue!

    Comment by Nate R. — August 7, 2012 @ 11:04 am

  9. In my work on the Philadelphia area, the idea of the BoM was important for what it represented (they would fight with the anti-Mormons in the area over BoM validity quite a bit), and the story of its coming forth played a role in conversion, but I found very few instances of passages being cited (other than in debates with the Mormon opponents).

    Comment by Steve Fleming — August 7, 2012 @ 11:56 am

  10. Interesting, Steve. I looked over the Levi Hancock auto Pete mentioned in the post and Hancock was converted when he heard that Jesus had appeared to his “other sheep” here in the Americas and taught them the same gospel. IIRC, there were also references to that effect in the McLellin diaries, so at least some missionaries were preaching from the text.

    Comment by David G. — August 7, 2012 @ 12:24 pm

  11. David,
    This is an angle that I hadn’t thought about getting at, but it seems relevant. Staker thinks that the actual text of the BoM played an important role for the early saints. He cites Terryl Given’s work and agrees that the BoM worked as a sign, but he disagrees in the following way: “However, the content of the book was also extremely important in shaping the behavior of early Members, and the Articles and Covenants upon which they built their community of believers was drawn from the teachings of the book.” (Page 87 note 23)
    I think Levi Hancock’s conversion narrative provides evidence for this. I will definitely keep my eyes open for others.

    Comment by Pete Wosnik — August 7, 2012 @ 1:27 pm

  12. Pete, I think that the role of the text of the Book of Mormon on early Mormons is one of the more important things to study. It’s interesting how a lot of the assumptions from when I was younger (it was primarily the book as a sign rather than its content) are being challenged.

    Comment by Clark — August 9, 2012 @ 4:48 pm


Series

Recent Comments

Steve Fleming on Study and Faith, 5:: “The burden of proof is on the claim of there BEING Nephites. From a scholarly point of view, the burden of proof is on the…”


Eric on Study and Faith, 5:: “But that's not what I was saying about the nature of evidence of an unknown civilization. I am talking about linguistics, not ruins. …”


Steve Fleming on Study and Faith, 5:: “Large civilizations leave behind evidence of their existence. For instance, I just read that scholars estimate the kingdom of Judah to have been around 110,000…”


Eric on Study and Faith, 5:: “I have always understood the key to issues with Nephite archeology to be language. Besides the fact that there is vastly more to Mesoamerican…”


Steven Borup on In Memoriam: James B.: “Bro Allen was the lead coordinator in 1980 for the BYU Washington, DC Seminar and added valuable insights into American history as we also toured…”


David G. on In Memoriam: James B.: “Jim was a legend who impacted so many through his scholarship and kind mentoring. He'll be missed.”

Topics


juvenileinstructor.org