JWHA 2011 Call For Papers

By January 14, 2011

2011 JWHA Annual Meeting Call for Papers


“E Unum Pluribus” (Out of One, Many)
September 22-25, 2011, in Nauvoo, Illinois

On June 27, 1844, the prophet Joseph Smith Jr. was killed at Carthage, Illinois, setting in motion a succession crisis that fragmented his young denomination into several competing factions. Many studies have considered the aftermath of Smith?s death. However, the members and leaders of the church were already separated by many divisive factors. These factors deserve exploration as we consider how church members decided which leader to follow, and how their faith was expressed theologically and in practice.

Also, Nauvoo was the seat of two prophets Joseph. Joseph Smith Jr. made Nauvoo his capital. His son, Joseph Smith III, on his return from his April 6, 1860 ordination at Amboy, Illinois, also made Nauvoo his capital. Comparative studies—theologically and demographically—of the city as the seat of prophets in two different eras might discover some interesting insights.

The program committee invites proposals for papers, panels, and whole sessions exploring divisions already present in the church prior to the martyrdom on topics such as: ethnic, socio-economic, British immigrants vs. Yankee, seekers and old guard vs. newer converts, Eastern US seaboard members vs. rural members, the material culture of various groups, the geography of the church (where were all the branches located and what was the membership population in places outside the Nauvoo area?), Nauvoo as headquarters of the original church as well as the first headquarters of Community of Christ, and community dynamics outside the church membership. The committee would like to gather every facet of history: institutional, social, economic, theological, women?s perspectives, minority perspectives, center vs. periphery, the international church, and more.

Please send your brief proposal, with a 1-page vita, to jwha2011@hotmail.com. The proposal deadline is February 28, 2011.

Article filed under Announcements and Events Categories of Periodization: Origins Comparative Mormon Studies


Comments

  1. Looks splendid. I really think this theme is an important one, and one understudies. Too often we look at the post-martyrdom period as the time of dynamic interpretations, ignoring the varying strands that existed within Mormonism even before JS’s death.

    Plus, any opportunity to visit Nauvoo is worthwhile.

    Comment by Ben — January 14, 2011 @ 12:22 pm

  2. Ben, agreed. I’m crossing my fingers that I’ll be able to go. Also, this is a beautiful graphic. Love it.

    Comment by Jared T — January 14, 2011 @ 12:32 pm

  3. Yeah, it’s Hameriffic.

    Comment by Ben — January 14, 2011 @ 12:36 pm

  4. We need to enable the “Like” button here in the comments.

    Comment by Jared T — January 14, 2011 @ 12:39 pm

  5. ex uno plura — no?

    Love the graphic on so many symbolic levels.

    Comment by Ardis E. Parshall — January 14, 2011 @ 1:04 pm

  6. A quick google search seems to indicate that this formulation is not grammatical, but sometimes used for effect:

    “Latin Editor’s note: Those who know Latin might tell us that the E Unum Pluribus of the title should be Ex Uno Plura, but then the fun of the pun would have been lost.”

    Comment by Jared T — January 14, 2011 @ 1:11 pm

  7. I have an advanced degree from Wet Blanket U.

    Comment by Ardis E. Parshall — January 14, 2011 @ 1:44 pm


Series

Recent Comments

Steve Fleming on BH Roberts on Plato: “Interesting, Jack. But just to reiterate, I think JS saw the SUPPRESSION of Platonic ideas as creating the loss of truth and not the addition.…”


Jack on BH Roberts on Plato: “Thanks for your insights--you've really got me thinking. I can't get away from the notion that the formation of the Great and Abominable church was an…”


Steve Fleming on BH Roberts on Plato: “In the intro to DC 76 in JS's 1838 history, JS said, "From sundry revelations which had been received, it was apparent that many important…”


Jack on BH Roberts on Plato: “"I’ve argued that God’s corporality isn’t that clear in the NT, so it seems to me that asserting that claims of God’s immateriality happened AFTER…”


Steve Fleming on Study and Faith, 5:: “The burden of proof is on the claim of there BEING Nephites. From a scholarly point of view, the burden of proof is on the…”


Eric on Study and Faith, 5:: “But that's not what I was saying about the nature of evidence of an unknown civilization. I am talking about linguistics, not ruins. …”

Topics


juvenileinstructor.org