Laurie F. Maffly-Kipp on the Lead-up to the Mormon Moment, and the Danforth Center for Religion and Politics

By April 24, 2012

Many of you may have already seen this, but it is worth repeating for those who either need a reminder or missed the announcement when it first hit the interwebz. As part of the lecture series for the John C. Danforth Center for Religion and Politics, based at the Washington University of St. Louis and ably led by the esteemed scholar R. Marie Griffeth, Laurie Maffly-Kipp delivered a brilliant presentation titled, “The Long Approach to the Mormon Moment: The Building of an American Church.” Maffly-Kipp needs no introduction in these circles–I’m sure we are all fans of her work, and I doubt I need to assure the presentation’s brilliance. But it is indeed brilliant.

Her lecture focuses on the one hundred year buildup to the present “Mormon Moment,” focusing on the intersections between Mormonism and the American body politic. Don’t think that you already know everything she is going to say, though, because she has an admittedly revisionist approach. For instance, when looking at the “assimilation” process that took place after Mormonism renounced polygamy, she says that the general narrative–that Saints gave up their “communal” identity and focused on individual traits of distinctness–overlooks some of the broader issues taking place. Here’s a taste:

I want to suggest that this focus on individual piety and practice obscures the politics and institutional dimensions of this transition. It also short-changes the extent to which Mormon citizenship came with particular promises and perils for those outside of the church as well as those inside. Instead, it is more clarifying to see the Mormon entry into American public life in the twentieth century as a carefully orchestrated dance, a performance figured as an intricate set of actions and reactions, with each side shifting constantly its movements to take into account the others? latest gesture.

The entire video can be found here.

I’ll also take this occasion to plug the Danforth Center and the wonderful work they are doing. A brief look at their events from the past year shows a “who’s who” in the scholarly study of religion and politics, and they have set a very high bar for the future. They also are weeks away from the first issue of the online journal Religion & Politics (including our own Max Mueller as Associate Editor), which is sure to carry fantastic material. The first issue will include essays from our own Matt Bowman, on Mormon libertarianism, as well as Max, on going to church with Tagg Romney. Make sure to go “like” their facebook pages, both for the journal and the center, so you can remain aware of exciting developments. We’ll have more on the journal next week when it launches.

Article filed under Categories of Periodization: Modern Mormonism Conference/Presentation Reports


Comments

  1. Thanks for highlighting LMK’s lecture, Ben. I’m excited about her forthcoming book. And the Danforth Center is doing some really great stuff. I look forward to the new journal launching soon.

    Comment by Christopher — April 24, 2012 @ 7:29 am

  2. Thanks, Ben. Big day in one week!

    Comment by Max — April 24, 2012 @ 10:20 pm


Series

Recent Comments

Steve Fleming on BH Roberts on Plato: “Interesting, Jack. But just to reiterate, I think JS saw the SUPPRESSION of Platonic ideas as creating the loss of truth and not the addition.…”


Jack on BH Roberts on Plato: “Thanks for your insights--you've really got me thinking. I can't get away from the notion that the formation of the Great and Abominable church was an…”


Steve Fleming on BH Roberts on Plato: “In the intro to DC 76 in JS's 1838 history, JS said, "From sundry revelations which had been received, it was apparent that many important…”


Jack on BH Roberts on Plato: “"I’ve argued that God’s corporality isn’t that clear in the NT, so it seems to me that asserting that claims of God’s immateriality happened AFTER…”


Steve Fleming on Study and Faith, 5:: “The burden of proof is on the claim of there BEING Nephites. From a scholarly point of view, the burden of proof is on the…”


Eric on Study and Faith, 5:: “But that's not what I was saying about the nature of evidence of an unknown civilization. I am talking about linguistics, not ruins. …”

Topics


juvenileinstructor.org