MHA’s 2020 Conference Goes Digital, or, Two Reasons to Invest in an MHA Membership

By May 21, 2020

Members of the Mormon History Association received an email in the past few days about the digital conference the organization will offer from June 6-12, 2020 (some presentations will be on the website for longer). There is no registration cost for MHA members; MHA membership is the only requirement for participation. You will receive a password to log in to mormonhistoryassociation.org to view the programming.

As conference co-chairs, Anne Berryhill and I have been blown away by how many people are anxious to help MHA put together programming for a digital conference. Teamwork, truly, makes the dream work. You can see the organization’s email HERE (LINK). The program is also available at the bottom of this post.

The only cost for the 2020 conference is membership in MHA. Digital membership is only $40, and student memberships are only $35, though if you’re like me, you’d prefer to have a physical copy of the journal ($70). You can join HERE. Here are two reasons you should join MHA for 2020 (and beyond!):

  1. Investment in MHA is an investment in the academic study of Mormon history.

Frankly, these are tough economic times. I know that and live that, and the academic job markets I’m entering this fall bear witness to this reality. My $70 is fair and reasonable for access to the Journal of Mormon History and membership in MHA. It’s also my small way of saying, “I want MHA and Mormon history to survive and thrive.” If you’ve let your membership lapse, this would be a great time to re-join. Friends at first are friends again at last, etc.  

Please renew your commitment to the academic study of Mormon history. Or, if you prefer, Latter-day Saint and Mormon history. I am an academic because of the skills I learned researching Mormonism and presenting at MHA. Every student, scholar, and consumer of Mormon history deserves the same opportunity that I and hundreds of others have had because of their participation in MHA.

  • MHA will make decisions on digital programming on future conferences based upon how 2020 goes.

If MHA 2020 goes well as a digital conference, it gives the organization the go-ahead to think about how we can have digital offerings at every conference. For those who face adverse health conditions, have economic constraints, or other reasons they cannot travel, this provides an option to participate online.

You may think to yourself, “I attend MHA every year, what does it matter to me if there are online offerings?”

I don’t think that digital programming will never replace face-to-face meetings. But, frankly, MHA members like me can examine our good fortune that institutions sponsor our travel or that we can find odd jobs to pay for travel, find friends to lodge with and scrimp to be able to pay for meals at conferences. Money, far too often, keeps people from participating at MHA. Digital programming allows more people to participate. More participation means more and better scholarship.

If we aren’t accessible to our membership and can’t allow folks who don’t have institutional affiliations or independent wealth to participate in MHA, then MHA will actively suffer for it. YOU can make a difference in making things better for all the many scholars and enthusiasts MHA hopes to reach by joining MHA. As an academic non-profit, digital options must make financial sense. If more folks join, the 2021 co-chairs can go to the Board and ask for the flexibility and funds to provide more content for MHA’s members.

So please. Join now. Support the academic study of Mormon history. Help MHA make history by pulling off a digital conference that is economically viable.

MHA Enrollment LINK

PRELIMINARY PROGRAM

Article filed under Miscellaneous


Comments

  1. Just curious as to why L. Hannah Stoddard of the Joseph Smith Foundation is not in the lineup of speakers in the upcoming annual meeting. Was she considered or asked? She is a must offset the strong progressive mindset as well as Lindsay Hanson Park. A grounded voice is what I’d like to hear & is why I will steer clear this invite. Though I do enjoy “Mormon History” a lot, I have a strong impression this will be a tickling of the ears, if not a platform for selling books of interpretations.

    Comment by Randy Erhart — May 23, 2020 @ 2:40 am

  2. Academic conferences aren’t for everyone.

    Also, if folks want to present then they should have applied to present. It’s that simple.

    Comment by J Stuart — May 24, 2020 @ 10:46 pm

  3. “Just curious as to why L. Hannah Stoddard of the Joseph Smith Foundation is not in the lineup of speakers in the upcoming annual meeting.”

    My very, very best guess, is because MHA is only interested in having people who can actually do history.

    Comment by Tim Barker — May 30, 2020 @ 12:11 pm


Series

Recent Comments

Steve Fleming on Study and Faith, 5:: “The burden of proof is on the claim of there BEING Nephites. From a scholarly point of view, the burden of proof is on the…”


Eric on Study and Faith, 5:: “But that's not what I was saying about the nature of evidence of an unknown civilization. I am talking about linguistics, not ruins. …”


Steve Fleming on Study and Faith, 5:: “Large civilizations leave behind evidence of their existence. For instance, I just read that scholars estimate the kingdom of Judah to have been around 110,000…”


Eric on Study and Faith, 5:: “I have always understood the key to issues with Nephite archeology to be language. Besides the fact that there is vastly more to Mesoamerican…”


Steven Borup on In Memoriam: James B.: “Bro Allen was the lead coordinator in 1980 for the BYU Washington, DC Seminar and added valuable insights into American history as we also toured…”


David G. on In Memoriam: James B.: “Jim was a legend who impacted so many through his scholarship and kind mentoring. He'll be missed.”

Topics


juvenileinstructor.org