New Permablogger

By February 26, 2009

In an effort to perpetuate the juvenile nature of our blog, we’ve invited Ryan T., the unusually bright undergraduate who contributed a couple of insightful guest posts here recently, to blog at the JI on a more permanent basis. He has graciously accepted. Please join us in welcoming him.

Article filed under Miscellaneous


Comments

  1. I should clarify that by juvenile, I mean only a reference to Ryan’s age and academic standing as an undergraduate. By all measures aside from age, he is infinitely more mature than some of the other permas here, myself included.

    Comment by Christopher — February 26, 2009 @ 6:53 pm

  2. So sophomoric. Great things are expected of you young man. 🙂

    Comment by Kent (MC) — February 26, 2009 @ 7:16 pm

  3. Welcome.

    Comment by David G. — February 26, 2009 @ 7:20 pm

  4. Welcome!

    Comment by Edje — February 26, 2009 @ 7:21 pm

  5. Cheers!

    Comment by J. Stapley — February 26, 2009 @ 9:21 pm

  6. You mean Ryan wasn’t already a perma? It’s about time you corrected that oversight, you Juveniles, you.

    Comment by Ardis Parshall — February 26, 2009 @ 9:41 pm

  7. Welcome. I’ve enjoyed your posts.

    Comment by Researcher — February 26, 2009 @ 9:51 pm

  8. Welcome, welcome.

    Comment by Jared T — February 26, 2009 @ 10:02 pm

  9. Hey, welcome to the JI bunch.

    Comment by Elizabeth — February 27, 2009 @ 5:26 pm


Series

Recent Comments

Steve Fleming on BH Roberts on Plato: “Interesting, Jack. But just to reiterate, I think JS saw the SUPPRESSION of Platonic ideas as creating the loss of truth and not the addition.…”


Jack on BH Roberts on Plato: “Thanks for your insights--you've really got me thinking. I can't get away from the notion that the formation of the Great and Abominable church was an…”


Steve Fleming on BH Roberts on Plato: “In the intro to DC 76 in JS's 1838 history, JS said, "From sundry revelations which had been received, it was apparent that many important…”


Jack on BH Roberts on Plato: “"I’ve argued that God’s corporality isn’t that clear in the NT, so it seems to me that asserting that claims of God’s immateriality happened AFTER…”


Steve Fleming on Study and Faith, 5:: “The burden of proof is on the claim of there BEING Nephites. From a scholarly point of view, the burden of proof is on the…”


Eric on Study and Faith, 5:: “But that's not what I was saying about the nature of evidence of an unknown civilization. I am talking about linguistics, not ruins. …”

Topics


juvenileinstructor.org