Review: Hudson, Real Native Genius

By July 30, 2018

Reproduced below are excerpts from my review of Angela Pulley Hudson’s Real Native Genius: How An Ex-Slave and a White Mormon Became Famous Indians. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2015, which appeared in the most recent issue of Mormon Historical Studies. MHS kindly granted me permission to post these excerpts. 

Angela Pulley Hudson’s Real Native Genius: How an Ex-Slave and a White Mormon Became Famous Indians, winner of the Evans Biography Award, is an engrossing dual biography of former-slave Warner McCary and his white wife, Lucy Stanton. Before this book, Mormon historians had known the McCarys primarily for their schismatic religious group in Winter Quarters and for their contribution to the development of the race-based priesthood and temple ban. Hudson, an associate professor of history at Texas A&M University, demonstrates in Real Native Genius that the McCarys’ Winter Quarters imbroglio was just one chapter in the lives of the couple, who subsequently reinvented themselves as “professional Indians”—Choctaw chief Okah Tubbee and Mohawk princess Laah Ceil Manatoi Tubbee—first as famous traveling performers and then as “Indian” medical practitioners. Hudson uses the couple’s gaudy lives as a window into the concept of “Indianness,” which she defines as “a wide-ranging set of ideas about how American Indians looked, talked, lived, and loved” (5). Real Native Genius is therefore one of a growing number of works that explore ways that Mormon history can illuminate broader themes in American history and culture.

Hudson situates her work at the nexus of two veins of scholarly inquiry: “playing Indian” and “passing.” “Playing Indian” is a low-stakes activity historically engaged in by powerful white men—for example, at the Boston Tea Party, or in elite clubs such as Order of Red Men, and in the Boy Scouts. “Passing,” on the other hand, is a high-stakes activity in which African Americans “passed” as white in order to access the privileges granted to whites and denied to blacks in American society. The McCarys present a compelling case study for these activities because they illustrate the malleability of these categories and particularly how adopting Indian identity could be a vehicle for a former black slave to escape the stigma of his skin color, for McCary and Stanton to deflect attention from their interracial marriage, and, perhaps unexpectedly, for the couple to perform religious beliefs.

Real Native Genius is well researched and well argued. Although a newcomer to Mormon Studies, Hudson worked with Spencer Fluhman, David Whittaker, Connell O’Donovan (who shared with Hudson his extensive research on McCary and Stanton), Paul Reeve, and seasoned Mormon historians, who helped her navigate the often-complicated terrain of the field. The book is not without occasional factual and interpretive problems, however. For instance, Hudson identifies Nelson Whipple as “a member of the Quorum of the Twelve” (87), though Whipple was in fact a seventy. In another place, she postulates that McCary and Stanton were “sealed” by Orson Hyde, relying on deeply problematic evidence (67). Despite these intermittent missteps, Hudson’s grasp of Mormon history is generally sound, and her analysis raises provocative questions about ways that Mormon beliefs about Indians interacted with broader themes in American history.


For the rest of the review, please see the issue. If you’re not a subscriber, you’re missing out. From their website: “Yearly subscriptions are available. Annual U.S. subscriptions are $30, Canadian subscriptions are $35, and international subscriptions are $40. To subscribe to Mormon Historical Studies, you may click on the link on the left sidebar or contact Kim Wilson at 801-916-7000 or” 

Article filed under Book and Journal Reviews Categories of Periodization: Origins Categories of Periodization: Territorial Period Cultural History Gender Race


  1. Thanks for this, David. Hudson’s book is one of my favorite Mormon Studies titles of the last few years.

    Comment by Christopher — July 30, 2018 @ 7:19 am

  2. Agreed, Christopher. It’s a fun book that raises a lot of important questions.

    Comment by David G. — July 30, 2018 @ 7:51 am

  3. Goodness. A few weeks ago I ran across a 20th century case of a black man married to a white woman who presented themselves as Indians and caused a bit of anxiety for the Mormons in England. I didn’t know what to do with that other than post it as an isolated oddity — had no idea it was part of a larger phenomenon. I’ve ordered this book, and after reading it maybe I’ll be able to tell that story — or maybe find that my “discovery” is already mentioned in this book, or even in David’s full review.

    Comment by Ardis E. Patrshall — July 30, 2018 @ 7:52 am

  4. Wow! Very interesting find, Ardis. I don’t think Hudson mentioned it in her book and I definitely did not in the full review. I do hope that you’ll be able to flesh out the 20th c. example of this in the future.

    Comment by David G. — July 30, 2018 @ 7:58 am

  5. Thanks, David!

    Comment by J Stuart — July 30, 2018 @ 10:34 am

  6. FWIW, up until a year ago, Signature Books was housed in the Nelson Wheeler Whipple residence (built 1854).

    Comment by Gary Bergera — July 30, 2018 @ 1:27 pm

  7. Thanks David. Looking forward to the read.

    Comment by wvs — August 1, 2018 @ 2:37 pm


Recent Comments

Ben S on What’s in a name?: “Ah, never mind. Skimmed too fast past the beginning. How embarrassing.”

Ben S on What’s in a name?: “How did you create that display?! I’d love to do something similar. I’ve looked at timeline software, and it’s all either expensive or useless.”

J. Stapley on What’s in a name?: “I'm that same boat as Ardis with the Mules. Fascinating!”

KLC on What’s in a name?: “I'm 65 and the term 'Jack Mormon' was quite common when I was growing up in the 60s and early 70s. I always understood…”

Ardis on What’s in a name?: “Am I the only one who *never* before recognized that "jack" used this way is connected to mules?? That stuns me. And delights me. I also…”

Questions on CFP: 2020 MHA Poster: “Will MHA accept proposals from students who have already sent in a proposal for a presentation or panel? If so should the poster be a…”