Summer Book Club: Reflections by Jared Farmer

By September 6, 2018

Over the last ten weeks, the Juvenile Instructor’s Summer Book Club has taken readers on a guided tour through Jared Farmer’s award-winning On Zion’s Mount: Mormons, Indians, and the American Landscape (Harvard UP, 2008). Jared has graciously agreed to share his reflections on the book, ten years after its initial publication.

(Posts in the series: introduction; chapter one, chapter two, chapter three, chapter four, chapter five, chapter six, chapter seven, chapter eight, chapter nine.)

 

 

“Utah, I Loved Thee”: Reflection by Jared Farmer

My gratitude to David G. and other members of Juvenile Instructor’s summer book club for their thoughtful comments about my second book, now ten years old.

On Zion’s Mount may be the most personal work I’ll ever write, and the least personalized. I don’t share with readers that I come from Provo. I don’t explain how my narration of Utah Lake and Mount Timpanogos, of Utes and Latter-day Saints, is also the story of the author losing his religion.

Although I never had a testimony to bear about Mormonism, I became, in adolescence, enthused by the historic Mormon idea of gathering in a sacred homeland. I felt I belonged in Utah, or belonged to Utah, and I wanted to assist societal reconsecration of a landscape that was, in my view, being defiled by improvident, unbeautiful development. Beyond career goals (earning a doctorate, joining the professoriate), I hoped that my Utah project would reveal something—something exalted, or at least redemptive, about the post-1847 record of place-making—that could sustain my heterodox belief in being Mormon.

My personal search ended in failure.

Academically, On Zion’s Mount found success, albeit in certain fields more than others. Some of my intended readers shunned the book for being too Mormon, or not Mormon enough. Even among reviewers and admirers, it seems to have been rarely digested whole. For this I take partial blame, for my work contains immoderate details and oversubtle arguments. If I could do it again, I would be more direct and less polite.

Writing this biography of a mountain, my greatest challenge was scale. The project needed to work on multiple levels: the local (Utah Valley) and the bioregional (the Great Basin); the territorial/state (Utah) and the ethnogeographic (Numic homeland, Mormon Zion); and, finally, the sectional (the American West) and the national (the United States). I devised parallel narratives to cover these scalar relationships. Thanks to the New Western History, I didn’t need to argue for the significance of western history; rather, I made an argument for the significance of local Utah history (including Nuche and Saints) for historians of the United States and other settler-colonial nations. In addition to decentering the early history of Deseret (away from Salt Lake City), I endeavored to write a postwestern, extralocal history that contextualized the Beehive State in national trends more than regional ones.

I recall my misery inputting the final edits as a transplant to Long Island, a geographic region that alienated me unlike anywhere I’d lived. Looking back, the continuing irony of my Utah project, born of love, is that it took me to a place—professionally, personally, and spiritually—whence I can’t go home.

 

Article filed under Categories of Periodization: Modern Mormonism Environmental History Summer Book Club


Comments

  1. Thanks, Jared. It’s always fascinating to get the backstory on books and how they came to be written.

    Comment by David G. — September 7, 2018 @ 5:56 am

  2. Thanks, Jared. I read chapter 6, at least, as a real sense of loss from a possible future that respected the mountain itself ecologically. I hope that the process of researching and writing had some catharsis in it, because the book as a whole does come across as a labor of love, if a tragic one

    Comment by Jeff T — September 8, 2018 @ 7:43 am

  3. Thanks very much, Jared. I loved re-reading your book and thinking about your reflections.

    Comment by J Stuart — September 9, 2018 @ 9:55 am

  4. Jared—your book challenged both my intellect and faith. Your writing, research and scope were amazing. I think I came through this experience in one piece with a better understanding of Utah Valley, Indian culture and Mormon traditions. Thank you! So glad to be introduced to On Zion’s Mount and Reflections.

    Comment by Mary Lou — September 15, 2018 @ 11:18 am


Series

Recent Comments

Spencer Woolley on MHA Deadline Quickly Approaching: “Hello, Mormon History People. Stephen Fleming and I are looking to put together a panel on the idea of Apostasy. My paper will address Apostasy…”


Scott on THE ARRINGTON CHAIR: : “Interesting analysis, Chris. I have a lot of respect for those involved with the search. They know the program and position well.”


Trevan Hatch on THE ARRINGTON CHAIR: : “Also, if LDS non-academic stakeholders are going to impact the decision (at least traditionally that has been the case with both Jewish studies and Mormon…”


Christopher Blythe on THE ARRINGTON CHAIR: : “Thanks, Trevan. I was not aware of the University of Nebraska case.”


Trevan Hatch on THE ARRINGTON CHAIR: : “I see no problem with Chris posting his thoughts on the chair in this blog. The finalist list is public knowledge, their CVs and publishing…”


Christopher Blythe on THE ARRINGTON CHAIR: : “Thanks, Amanda, if I thought they would be concerned by it, I would not have posted it.”

Topics


juvenileinstructor.org