Women of Faith in the Latter Days, Vol 2

By March 23, 2013

Review of: Richard E. Turley, Jr. and Brittany A. Chapman, eds., Women of Faith in the Latter Days: Volume Two, 1821 – 1845 (Deseret Book, 2012).

I really cannot improve upon the opening lines of the introduction to this projected seven-volume series:

Although approximately half the people in the history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints have been women, their lives of faith and dedication are just beginning to receive the attention they merit. This series, Women of Faith in the Latter Days, aims to enhance awareness of these women through inspirational accounts written for a general readership.

The newest edition, the second in the series, considers thirty women* born between 1821 and 1845, and it’s a blockbuster volume both in the women who are included and in the list of authors who set their hand to crafting readable yet accurate and historically contextualized narratives of their lives. The essays purposely introduce both “well-known and previously obscure” women, presenting them in alphabetical order, a notably democratic editorial decision. They epitomize the pioneer women whose piety and self-sacrifice could have easily become fossilized in sentimental hagiography. But that’s not what this series is about, thank heaven. These are real and complex women, often told in their own words, whose struggles, challenges and triumphs have much to say both on a personal level to their contemporary readers and as a window into the genuinely messy world of 19th-century Mormonism.

Each essay includes a thumbnail portrait image, a brief biographical sketch and a longer “Life Experiences” section, sometimes quoting at length from the subject’s own extant personal writings including trail diaries, testimonies, journals, memoirs, and letters. I took some light notes on the women and their life experiences, looking for patterns (my notes are here as a Google spreadsheet). All but two were Anglo-American: one was Norwegian (though born in New York) and one was African American. Ten were born in the British Isles and emigrated to America; seven born in New York itself, three in New England, and the other ten in mid-Atlantic and frontier states (Ohio, Indiana, Pennsylvania). I find it interesting that so few come from Scandinavia – but maybe that’s the next volume; their conversion narratives reflect the fruits of the very early American frontier and British Isles missionization in the Church’s first ten years. Very many of them gathered to Missouri and/or Nauvoo, and all of them crossed the plains to Utah before 1857. Naturally the collection skews towards the long-lived because such women provided not only written sources but high numbers of appreciative record-keeping descendants, and some of these women died at a very old age indeed – their death dates range from 1877 to 1932! They became the core kingdom-builders in the latter half of the nineteenth century – temple matrons, presidents of Relief Society, founders of Deseret Hospital, deliverers of babies, healers, suffrage activists, leaders of Salt Lake church society. Others were groundbreakers in previously unsettled territories: Idaho, Arizona, Mexico, eking out lives perilously close to homesteading disaster. Marriage (especially young marriage, and then also abandonment, divorce and widowhood) and childbearing (and so infant death) are persistent themes; most of these women outlived their husbands and children, some of them by decades. As a group, they grew from young converts to a green faith into no-nonsense matriarchs of a staggeringly fertile people.

In my view, the series (and perhaps this volume in particular) has to strike a delicate balance between portraying “representative women” versus exceptional “founding mothers.” The takeaway message must be both that any woman can be faithful regardless of her circumstances and that the early Church’s particular history — with its emphasis on gathering, defending the faith in a hostile climate, and settlement-planting in harsh Western conditions — created a generation with uniquely tempered steel at its core. The essays each stand alone, without any overarching thematic or historical introduction (though Turley and Chapman do include a detailed timeline at the beginning), so it’s left to the reader to identify commonalities, linkages, or connections to broader historical developments. I’m intrigued to think about how the series, as it emerges, will come to be used – devotional reading? lessons? talks? as a reference encyclopedia set adorning living rooms? could they be used as a course text?

This volume’s contribution to a steady accumulation of high-quality stories about Mormon women (especially using their own words) bodes extremely well on many levels. It may lead more to the primary sources that form the basis of each essay. It shows (as if there was any doubt) that women contributed substantively to Mormon communities, publications, and leadership and thus to the extant written and visual record of the Mormon past. Thus, it strengthens the argument that the movement’s history cannot be told without meaningfully including women’s voices. But it also invites contemplation on women not included – those who died too soon to have left a memoir, or who were not educated, white, English-speaking or well-connected, or even those who were not stalwart. They are part of the story of Mormonism in the latter days, too, and it’s worth thinking about how (and why) we might explore their lives as well.

*Deseret advertises that there are additional biographies in the Bookshelf eBook edition – has anyone bought this version? The publisher’s website also includes this interview with the editors explaining the project’s genesis and goals – worth a look –

Article filed under Book and Journal Reviews Women's History


  1. Thanks, Tona, for the thoughtful review. Watching the video, it occurred to me that this book (potentially) helps to illuminate the other half of Sam Wineburg’s argument–that people tend to see the past as similar if not identical to their current experience. The editors refer to survey data where Mormons said they wanted history to focus on past members who had “the same kind of” experiences, trials, emotions, etc. as those of modern Saints. The editors, therefore, selected women who could fulfill those parameters. Do you think that the book does that, or are there attempts in the essays to encourage readers to “think historically,” by showing how the past is not only familiar, but also strange and distant?

    Comment by David G. — March 23, 2013 @ 10:13 am

  2. I, too, thought it was interesting that the need for the book seemed to emerge from focus groups and from giving people what they wanted about the past. I think the final product is much less slick/packaged than the video makes it sound. The stories are a lot less sanitized than I would have expected. Their lives sound tragic, triumphant and extremely difficult partly because of the times in which they lived – i.e. what this book doesn’t convey is the degree to which Mormon women building Zion were like any cohort of women of similar race and class in the 19th century. They appear quite different from *us*, but perhaps not so much when compared to non-Mormon homesteaders, immigrants, Christians, territorial settlers, community organizers, and matriarchs of gigantic families in the same decades in frontier settings. Using “frontier” guardedly, of course.

    Comment by Tona H — March 23, 2013 @ 2:07 pm

  3. Seeing the various types of authors included together makes me happy. I’ve bought this one, but haven’t had a chance to read it yet. Thanks for your thoughts. I’m looking forward to getting into it.

    Comment by J. Stapley — March 23, 2013 @ 6:33 pm

  4. You bring up something interesting at the end, about those that were not stalwart and how we can think about their lives as well. Using these volumes devotionally or as research books is, of course, fine, but I’d love to see the not-so-stalwart included in the Mormon narrative as well. (Not to mention the not-white, non-English-speaking, etc. That goes without saying.)

    Comment by Saskia — March 24, 2013 @ 8:36 am

  5. Thanks, Tona!

    Comment by Ryan T — March 24, 2013 @ 7:25 pm

  6. Perhaps the stories of the not-so-stalwart would be more appropriate in a volume entitled something other than “Women of Faith . . . .”

    As to non-whites, I suspect that the inclusion of Jane Manning James makes women of African ancestry over-represented, since surely fewer than one in thirty of Mormon women in that era were of African descent.

    Comment by Mark B. — March 24, 2013 @ 7:53 pm

  7. I’d also be interested to see if there are more Scandinavian women in the upcoming volumes, but I would guess that due to issues of literacy/ESL, many of them would not have left extensive records, and since the submissions process places a great emphasis on personal writings, many early Swedish or Danish (Norwegian, Icelandic) pioneer women wouldn’t make the cut. But I really enjoyed reading the story of Sarah Nelson Peterson. I’d only heard her stories before in the context of her husband’s community responsibilities, so it was a real treat to get to read a stand-alone account of her life.

    Comment by Amy T — March 26, 2013 @ 3:28 pm

  8. […] Amy T: Women of Faith in […]

    Pingback by Juvenile Instructor » In the Ghetto: I Like It Here, but When Can I Get Out? — March 27, 2013 @ 7:16 am

  9. […] books.   Also, for an excellent review of Women of Faith, volume 2, see Tona’s post here, and for a discussion of the place and usefulness of biography in Mormon women’s history, you […]

    Pingback by Juvenile Instructor » An Evening with the Editors and Authors of Women of Faith, Volume 2 — April 4, 2013 @ 11:45 am


Recent Comments

J Stuart on Reassessing the Classics: Armand: “Armand, your response made me unexpectedly emotional. Your work has shaped me as a scholar in many important ways, but your legendary willingness to engage…”

Ardis E. Parshall on Reassessing the Classics: Armand: “I've enjoyed these three discussions -- crowned by this response by Armand Mauss himself. It is so representative of his ability and willingness to interact…”

Armand Mauss on Reassessing the Classics: Armand: “I am pleasantly surprised and deeply grateful for the three assessments offered in this space this week by Gary Shepherd, Jana Riess, and Matt Bowman.…”

Roger T on Reassessing the Classics: Armand: “Since I work in Mormon studies, I tend to read a lot. It's impossible to keep up with everything being published, but over the past…”

Jeff T on Q&A with Taylor Petrey,: “Thanks, Taylor!”

Jeff T on The Mechanics of Applying: “Thanks, J!”