Reviewed by Jon England, Ph.D. Candidate at Arizona State University
In April of 2013, Elder Marcus B. Nash of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints’ Quorum of the Seventy gave a lecture at the University of Utah’s Wallace Stegner Center Symposium. In his lecture, titled “Righteous Dominion and Compassion for the Earth,” Nash explained that the Mormon environmental ethic revolves around the concept of “stewardship” and the need to care for God’s creations. Coincidentally, just a few months later, historians Jedediah Rogers and Matthew Godfrey began exploring the possibility of a book on Mormon environmental history. The result is The Earth Will Appear as the Garden of Eden, a collection of essays from both established scholars and young historians of Mormon environmental history.
In the
first essay, Rogers takes us through the historiography of Mormon environmental
history and identifies some of the gaps. He references Lynn White Jr.’s 1967
assertion that Christianity is to blame for environmental degradation. This has
become a central debate in environmental history, and each author approaches it
through the context of their various subjects. Sara Dant gets at the roots of
Mormon environmental ethics by questioning the legitimacy of a Brigham Young
quote: “There shall be no private ownership of the streams that come out of the
canyons, nor the timber that grows on the hills. These belong to the people:
all the people.”[1] I
won’t spoil the ending, but I will say that she reminds historians to double
check their sources. She also identifies the tension within the Mormon
environmental ethic between communal stewardship and a market economy. Thomas
Alexander’s “Lost Memory and Environmentalism” works to confirm Dant’s
conclusion. Mormon settlers began with an environmental ethic (a bit of a
misguided ethic, but an ethic nonetheless), which they forgot as they secularized
their sense of entrepreneurship. As a result, the Wasatch Front environment
suffered with overgrazing, air pollution, and a decline of native species.
Most
environmental histories of the Latter-day Saints deal with their time in Utah
and settling the West. Matthew Godfrey, however, shows that over a decade
before Brigham Young attempted to make the “desert blossom as a rose” in
northern Utah, Joseph Smith was teaching the Saints to do the same thing in
Missouri. And Brett Dowdle provides an insightful look at how American Mormon
missionaries in England and British converts in the U.S. perceived new
environments.
Richard
Francaviglia takes us back to the Great Basin and posits that Mormons used and
created maps that show how they viewed the land they were settling. These maps
obviously proved essential in building cities, but also expressed the vision
Mormons had for their settlements. Betsy Gaines Quammen delves into land policy
with an examination of the history and founding of Zion National Park. She
convincingly asserts that Thoreauvian ideals of wholesome nature converged
harmoniously (for the most part) in Zion with Mormon perceptions of practical
wilderness use. Jeff Nichol’s essay, however, argues that the Mormon sense of
stewardship had its limits. Echoing Dant and Alexander, Nichol exposes the
tensions within Mormon environmental thought of communitarian ideals and market
successes within the context of the livestock industry. Communal projects, such
as shared ranges, helped establish Mormon communities, but overgrazing became
more prolific as Utah moved toward a market economy. Overgrazing livestock
changed the local environment in disastrous ways.
Another way
Mormons changed their environment was through irrigation. Brian Frehner
complicates the history of reclamation projects with the story of St. Thomas,
Nevada. Mormons founded St. Thomas in 1865, and for decades struggled to keep
it afloat only to watch it literally sink under the waters of Lake Mead in
1938. In 2002 however, remnants of the town reappeared due to the diminished
flow of the Colorado River. The story of St. Thomas is one of both success and
failure and shows that reclamation projects never fully accomplished their purpose
to control nature in the Southwest.
The last
few essays focus on the diminishing agrarian culture of the Church through the
twentieth century. Brian Cannon shows
that this change came despite Mormon leaders’ efforts to keep the Church’s
agrarian identity. Nathan Waite illustrates how Church president Spencer W. Kimball
looked to preserve the connection between the land and the Church by
encouraging members to maintain gardens. Rebecca Anderson offers a fascinating
look at the history of place and memory by comparing Ensign Peak to the gravel
pits that line Beck Street just to the north. While Ensign Peak represents the
early Mormon vision of what Zion could become, the gravel pits show the reality
of development.
George
Handley provides a fitting conclusion to this collection with a summation of
what Mormonism has to offer environmentalism. He also identifies what’s at
stake. Mormonism has yet to embrace its own environmental ethic in an effective
way. Fortunately, this collection represents a possible turning point as it
reflects the growing concern among Mormons, particularly among the younger
generation, for the environment.
The authors touch on issues specific to Utah
such as over-development and smog, and global issues like climate change, but
not in-depth, leaving room for more discussion and analysis. Just as Elder
Nash’s lecture (which is included in the appendix) opened the door for more
conversation around the Mormon environmental ethic, Eden lays the
groundwork for more substantial work in the environmental history of Mormonism.
[1]
Sara Dant, “The ‘Lion of the Lord’ and the Land: Brigham Young’s Environmental
Ethic,” The Earth Will Appear as the Garden of Eden, 29
The Joseph Smith Papers Documents, Documents 8: February-November 1841 reveal Joseph Smith’s life as he endeavored to build a city and expand the faith that he led. These documents also reveal the interstices between these two projects. Through correspondence, revelations, sermons, financial documents, meeting minutes and other significant documents, Volume 8’s editorial team helps readers to understand the multifaceted growth of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints after its first large-scale transatlantic push and before the introduction of temple liturgy.
In the documents created over ten short months, readers begin to see how Joseph Smith’s life was complicated by the many forms of government that he oversaw. Most notably, to me, Joseph Smith and his followers strove to build a city that offered a liberal view of religious tolerance to any who would live in it. The Nauvoo City Council Book records, “Catholics, Presbyterians, Methodists, Baptists, Latter-Day-Saints, Quakers, Episcopalians Universali[s]ts Unitarians, Mahommedans, and all other religious sects and denominations whatever, shall have free toleration and equal Privilieges in this City.” Joseph Smith himself promised to hear any case wherein any person “guilty of ridiculing abusing, or otherwise depreciating another in consequence of his religion or of disturbing, or interrupting any religious meeting, within the Limits of this City,” could be fined up to $500 and receive six months imprisonment.[1]
We welcome this guest post by friends of the JI Jedediah S. Rogers, one of the editors of the Utah Historical Quarterly, and Matthew C. Godfrey, Managing Historian and one of the General Editors of the Joseph Smith Papers.
In 2012 the renowned environmental historian Mark
Fiege published The Republic of Nature:
An Environmental History of the United States. In that book, Fiege took
well-known events in American history and examined them through the lens of
environmental history. This approach generated fresh and fascinating insights
into subjects ranging from the construction of the transcontinental railroad to
the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark Brown
v. Board of Education decision. As William Cronon noted in the Foreword,
“No book before it has so compellingly demonstrated the value of applying
environmental perspectives to historical events that at first glance may seem
to have little to do with ‘nature’ or ‘the environment.’”[1]
Inspired by Fiege’s innovative approach, we started
discussing the need for more historians to use the environmental lens to
explore events in Mormon history—a subfield it seemed to us that did not
self-consciously much swim in environmental history waters. As colleagues at
Historical Research Associates, Inc., we had worked on projects for a variety
of clients that presented us with opportunities to explore environmental
history using a number of analytical approaches. This, in addition to our
training and publications in both environmental and Mormon history, gave us
confidence that we had something to say on the subject. Both of us recognized
that a handful of scholars and writers—Richard Jackson, Terry Tempest Williams,
Tom Alexander, George Handley, and Jared Farmer, to name a few—had examined the
interactions of Saints with nature, but we believed this was largely an
underutilized approach in Mormon history.
Last year, MHA’s Face-to-Face mentorship event was a smashing hit, so we are bringing it back to this year’s conference! The purpose of this ninety-minute event is to facilitate conversations between applicants and experienced scholars of Mormon history. We are seeking applications from those interested in participating, whether as mentors or as students, independent researchers, non-traditional students, and so forth. Applicants can propose to talk to people about their research, career trajectories, digital humanities, publishing, and public history, and more! This is an amazing opportunity to have a one-on-one conversation and to receive specific advice about your unique place in the field of Mormon history.
For those seeking mentoring, use your application to describe your current research and interests in Mormon history. Who would you love to talk to and why? Or, if you are new to the field (or not sure who would best align with your interests), tell us about the conversation you’d like to have. Are you trying to think through a research problem? Figuring out how to take the next step to publish your book? Wondering how independent historians make it work? Exploring what’s next for you in the field?
In your application:
• Tell us who you are and what brings you to Mormon history (student, independent researcher, non-traditional student etc)
• Tell us about your research. What is your research project and the questions that drive it? What kind of historical sources and scholarship inform it?
• What do you hope to get out of this conversation? What problems are you hoping to brainstorm or solve?
• What is your career trajectory, what challenges do you face?
• Identify people in the field of Mormon history who would be helpful mentors and briefly state why. (Hint: check out the preliminary conference program w to see who will be at the conference)
Email applications to mha.face2face [at] gmail.com by May 5, 2019. Applications will be reviewed by members of the MHA Board. If you are interested in participating in this event as a mentor, please send us an email to the same address.
For more information please contact Hannah Jung at junghannah [at] gmail.com.
Kurt Manwaring has published an interview with historian Ignacio Garcia over on his site, From the Desk. Garcia earned his Ph.D. in History from the University of Arizona and is Lemuel Hardison Redd, Jr. Professor of Western & Latino History at Brigham Young University and is President Elect of the Mormon History Association. An excerpt from Manwaring’s site is posted below; click over to From the Desk to read the rest!
What are the most important changes MHA has made in the past decade and where do you hope to see the organization 10 years from now? What factors most influence the organization’s ability to realize the progress you envision?
The Mormon History Association is conducting a search for editor of the Journal of Mormon History. The editor of the journal determines the content, solicits submissions, oversees peer review, works with submitting authors in performing substantive and stylistic content editing, and coordinates with a JMH production staff and the University of Illinois Press to ensure that issues of the journal are published according to deadline and within budget. The editor has full editorial control of the journal but reports to the MHA board of directors in maintaining a high-quality product that serves as the flagship publication for the organization. The Mormon History Association is particularly interested in candidates with an academic institutional affiliation but will consider submissions by all qualified applicants.
The person chosen to be the editor will be appointed to a four-year term beginning in January 2020, renewable at the discretion of the MHA board of directors.
From http://www.hilobrow.com/2015/07/11/laurel-thatcher-ulrich/
On April 12th and 13th (this coming weekend!) there is a festschrift/retirement event in celebration of Laurel Thatcher Ulrich’s illustrious career as a Pulitzer and Bancroft Prize winning historian. She joined the history department faculty at Harvard in 1995 and did incredible work to transform the university and mentor students there.
But, as many of us in the Mormon history world know, Laurel was not only prolific author and mentor in the Ivy League halls. She also helped to foster Mormon feminists and upcoming scholars in Mormon history. On April 13th, MHA’s executive director Barbara Jones Brown will be speaking about Laurel’s mentorship in the Mormon history community. She would love to have people send her their experiences with Laurel as a mentor in the Mormon history community. People can do so directly by emailing her (bjonesbrown [at} gmail [dot] com) or they can comment on this post with their experiences.
To get the ball rolling, I will start:
I first met Laurel at MHA in 2013. I had bought her book Well Behaved Women Seldom Make History and I decided to muster up the courage to ask her to sign it. She agreed and opened the book only to find that it was an already signed copy. Oops. I asked her to sign it again because I am an awkward human being.
In 2015, I moved to Boston and reintroduced myself (without mention of the first incident). I asked to audit her Harvard class on the family in American history and she graciously let me do so. This was the beginning of the mentorship relationship that I had with Laurel: she served as an anchor point for me in a vulnerable period for me as I was applying to PhD programs. I am certain that her letter of reference was one of the turning points that got me accepted into two history programs.
Yes, Laurel is a well-decorated historian and Harvard professor. But to me she modelled something beyond just that. During the MHA conference in 2013, I remember watching as she challenged one presenter during the Q&A about the specifics of the Nauvoo Relief Society minutes. Laurel always seemed to me to model a quiet confidence in her ideas and research. She was not afraid to challenge assumptions or prod someone to better articulate their ideas. Laurel managed to strike a fine balance between critical and supportive that we so often long for in mentors.
The Third Annual Meeting of The Book of Mormon Studies Association October 11–12, 2019 Utah State University
The Book of Mormon Studies Association (BoMSA) is pleased
to announce its third annual meeting, to be held October 11–12, 2019, at Utah
State University. The event is sponsored by USU’s Department of Religious
Studies and with thanks to both Philip Barlow and Patrick Mason, successive
occupiers of the Leonard J. Arrington Chair of Mormon History and Culture.
This annual event gathers a variety of scholars invested
in serious academic study of the Book of Mormon. It has no particular theme but
instead invites papers on any subject related to the Book of Mormon from any
viable academic angle. This year’s two keynote speakers will be Paul Gutjahr
(Indiana University) and Amy Easton-Flake (Brigham Young University). We will
also hold a special book interview session with Community of Christ scholar
Dale E. Luffman.
We therefore invite the submission of papers and
proposals for inclusion in the 2019 conference program. Note that newcomers to
the organization are required to submit a full paper for consideration, while
those who have presented at either of the previous two conferences are free to
submit a proposal or a paper. Papers submitted should be no longer than 4000
words, while proposals should be between 500 and 750 words.
Steve Fleming on Study and Faith, 5:: “The burden of proof is on the claim of there BEING Nephites. From a scholarly point of view, the burden of proof is on the…”
Eric on Study and Faith, 5:: “But that's not what I was saying about the nature of evidence of an unknown civilization. I am talking about linguistics, not ruins. …”
Steve Fleming on Study and Faith, 5:: “Large civilizations leave behind evidence of their existence. For instance, I just read that scholars estimate the kingdom of Judah to have been around 110,000…”
Eric on Study and Faith, 5:: “I have always understood the key to issues with Nephite archeology to be language. Besides the fact that there is vastly more to Mesoamerican…”
Steven Borup on In Memoriam: James B.: “Bro Allen was the lead coordinator in 1980 for the BYU Washington, DC Seminar and added valuable insights into American history as we also toured…”
David G. on In Memoriam: James B.: “Jim was a legend who impacted so many through his scholarship and kind mentoring. He'll be missed.”
Recent Comments
Steve Fleming on Study and Faith, 5:: “The burden of proof is on the claim of there BEING Nephites. From a scholarly point of view, the burden of proof is on the…”
Eric on Study and Faith, 5:: “But that's not what I was saying about the nature of evidence of an unknown civilization. I am talking about linguistics, not ruins. …”
Steve Fleming on Study and Faith, 5:: “Large civilizations leave behind evidence of their existence. For instance, I just read that scholars estimate the kingdom of Judah to have been around 110,000…”
Eric on Study and Faith, 5:: “I have always understood the key to issues with Nephite archeology to be language. Besides the fact that there is vastly more to Mesoamerican…”
Steven Borup on In Memoriam: James B.: “Bro Allen was the lead coordinator in 1980 for the BYU Washington, DC Seminar and added valuable insights into American history as we also toured…”
David G. on In Memoriam: James B.: “Jim was a legend who impacted so many through his scholarship and kind mentoring. He'll be missed.”