What to Expect When You’re Expecting to Attend MHA

By May 23, 2018

Last week commenter acw wrote: “As one who hasn’t ever attended but has considered it,, could you also post some kind of MHA for newbies guide? Like why and how to come/participate, etc.” Below I provide a general description of what to expect and how to attend. In a subsequent post I’ll talk about the whys and hows of my experience at MHA as an avocational historian. We’re hoping to get together a few other what-it’s-like posts from different perspectives.

How to Attend

Register and then show up! You will find information on registration, fees, hotel discounts, tours, scheduling, etc, at the MHA website. Note in particular the preliminary schedule.

You can register for the whole conference or just some of the days. (There are also optional tours before and after the conference.) Registering beforehand is cheaper, but you can also register at the door. The conference is for dues-paying members of the Mormon History Association, so if you are not a member or are in arrears, you’ll need to pay up as part of the registration process.

There is a conference hotel and you can get a discount for the conference. You do not have to stay at the conference hotel, though it is very convenient—you can easily slip off to take a nap during the day or drop off books or whatever. It can also make it easier to join with others for meals.

Dress is approximately business casual. (I’ll describe men’s dress because I am more confident of the terms.) Slacks and a collar shirt (short or long sleeve, button-down or polo) are pretty standard. Shorts, blue jeans, and T-shirts are rare in the evenings and pretty uncommon during the day. Neckties and/or sports jackets are more common but not universal and are probably not even in the majority. I do see the occasional stylish two-piece and three-piece suits but I don’t think I’ve ever seen a tux. The dress vibe is pretty chill. I fairly frequently see running or tennis shoes.

What to Expect

I’m not sure of my audience here, so I’ll try out a few comparisons. MHA conferences are like:

  • … high school in a hotel for three days with a bunch of nerds.
  • … EFY with less cheering and crying.
  • … other professional / academic conferences I have attended (engineering, education, history, theology).

Jane Goodall hiding behind a plastic ficus in the lobby might report that MHA is…

  • … more carefully dressed than secondary teaching or engineering conferences (the teachers are away from the students and are relaxing and the engineers really like T-shirts). MHA’s business casual is slightly more relaxed than other national history conferences but slightly more formal than regional history conferences.
  • … more generically friendly than engineering conferences and most academic conferences. MHA has a wide variety of participants and being socially approachable across skill and interest levels is more of a norm there than in other conferences I have attended.
  • … more age diverse than teacher or engineering conferences. Like other history conferences it will have attendees from every age decade from 20s to 80s but it will probably have more from 60s and 70s than most.
  • … less race diverse than other conferences. MHA is looking more and more like America, but it is still a disproportionately white group.
  • … quieter and less kinetic than engineering or computer conferences. Vendors will not generally be playing loud music nor will you be pelted with Nerf projectiles.

The basic Components

Registration desk: You can’t just walk in. You’ll get a name badge, a schedule, and some informational papers/coupons.

Plenary Sessions: Some of the talks/presentations are for the conference at large. The speakers are prominent and good and usually have very interesting things to say.

Break-out Sessions / Concurrent Sessions: This is the meat of the conference. In sessions lasting ninety minutes scholars present and/or discuss their findings. Session format can vary, but a pretty typical one is three speakers each giving a twenty-minute talk and then a respondent giving a ten- to fifteen-minute talk addressing all three, followed by audience questions. The hardest thing about the break-out sessions is that you have to choose: there will be several sessions at the same time and you cannot be at all of them. You can, however, quietly slip in and out the back of sessions if you want to hear particular papers.

Formal meals / ceremonies: Some of the events include banquets (though it’s usually just regular convention fare).

Informal meals: I personally find it hard to fit the cost of the formal meals into my budget, so I usually go to a nearby restaurant instead with like-budgeted individuals. These meals are usually the highlight of the conference for me.

Vendor booths: Publishers that target readers of Mormon History will show selections of their books. It is a great chance to catch some deals. It is also a convenient way to keep tabs on what is being published and to make reading lists.

Milling around and talking: There is enough time between sessions that there are frequently people around with whom you can converse (assuming y’all can get over the I-don’t-know-you-yet barriers).


I’m just gonna copy some comments from the earlier post.

From Gary Bergera:

(1) Don’t hesitate to engage a presenter after her/his presentation. Almost everybody loves it when someone takes an interest in her/his work, especially in articles and books.

(2) Don’t hesitate to ask questions during Q&A. (There may be no dumb questions, but it does help when one pays attention and asks relevant, thoughtful questions.)

(3) Don’t hesitate to sit next to strangers during sessions, during lunches/dinners, on tour buses, etc.

(4) Try not to argue and/or discuss politics (don’t assume everyone’s a member of your political party–they’re not).

(5) Try not to ask questions or make statements that might be more appropriately asked/made during an explicitly religious service (this isn’t meant to silence expressions of faith, etc., merely to suggest that one try to be aware and appreciative of boundaries). And

(6) try not to take things so seriously–if you can’t have fun and enjoy yourself at MHA, where can you?

From Ardis:

Presenters DO love it when people engage them immediately after a presentation — sometimes that is the only direct response they get to a paper or project that has engaged them for months.

Be sensitive, though, to others who might to greet the presenter. Don’t monopolize his time with lengthy explanations of your own theory of the topic, or how your grandmother’s brother’s wife’s uncle’s bishop found himself in a situation kinda sorta like the one the presenter just spoke about, only not really. That “glad to talk to you” will sour into “would you please go away” if the speaker sees the people he wanted to hear from give up and drift away.

We hope to see you at MHA!

Article filed under Conference/Presentation Reports Current Events Miscellaneous Mormon History Association


  1. Thanks for this thorough and inspiring intro! I hope to make it one of these years.

    Comment by acw — May 23, 2018 @ 8:37 am

  2. Thanks for the great writeup! I’ve always wanted to attend MHA, but never seemed to have the time to do it. Now that it’s in my hometown, how could I resist?! I’m really looking forward to this.

    “The hardest thing about the break-out sessions is that you have to choose: there will be several sessions at the same time and you cannot be at all of them.”

    This is my dilemma. How in the world and I supposed to choose from all of those amazing concurrent sessions? Especially Friday morning!

    Comment by Curtis C — May 23, 2018 @ 8:56 am

  3. I see the First Timers’ Breakfast is on the schedule this year, which is another place to break the ice, have questions answered, and recognize others who might feel a little awkward and be glad to meet someone else they can share any lingering awkwardness with.

    I don’t see the usual MWHIT breakfast on the preliminary program. If it is occurring this year, here’s a strong plug for attendance by women AND men who are interested in or working on women’ in Mormon history. Great time and place to network.

    Also, MWHIT is holding its third annual bazaar this year, a mini-version of the old Relief Society bazaars you’ve probably heard of. It’s fun to look at and bid on, and if you’re shy about striking up conversations with strangers, then admiring something for sale is a good excuse to talk with someone else who is also looking over the displays.

    Comment by Ardis — May 23, 2018 @ 9:56 am

  4. Thanks, Edje!

    In case anyone else is as unorganized as me: the conference hotel doesn’t have any more rooms at the MHA rate ($122 per night), but there are several sister hotels within a block or two walking distance that will honor the MHA rate. In particular, Hotel 43 has done this for me.

    Also, if you’re a student, there’s a student reception! That’s always been one of the highlights for me.

    Comment by Jeff T — May 23, 2018 @ 2:20 pm

  5. Great comments, y’all.

    Comment by Edje Jeter — May 23, 2018 @ 4:07 pm

  6. I’ll be there.

    I first started subscribing to the Journal circa 1995, because I was teaching a stake church history class and thought I ought to subscribe, and you do that by joining the Association. For a long time it didn’t occur to me to go to a conference, because I had it in my heard that you had to be a professional academic to do that. Then in 2003 the conference came to Kirtland, and I thought that would make a fun road trip, so I decided to give it a try. And I had a blast. I’ve endeavored to go every year since, and have only missed maybe three of them for various reasons.

    Comment by Kevin Barney — May 24, 2018 @ 12:18 pm


Recent Comments

Smb on Reassessing the Classics: Armand: “Armand is a wise and lovely man who deserves these kind words. I absolutely agree that his books were key entries in the scholar’s library…”

J Stuart on Reassessing the Classics: Armand: “Armand, your response made me unexpectedly emotional. Your work has shaped me as a scholar in many important ways, but your legendary willingness to engage…”

Ardis E. Parshall on Reassessing the Classics: Armand: “I've enjoyed these three discussions -- crowned by this response by Armand Mauss himself. It is so representative of his ability and willingness to interact…”

Blair Hodges on Reassessing the Classics: Armand: “Thank you for your lasting contributions to Mormon Studies, Armand.”

Mirror on Reassessing the Classics: Armand: “These have been interesting posts about a major work in Mormon Studies. If I may boil down my understanding of Mauss' thesis to a…”

Armand Mauss on Reassessing the Classics: Armand: “I am pleasantly surprised and deeply grateful for the three assessments offered in this space this week by Gary Shepherd, Jana Riess, and Matt Bowman.…”